2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5441
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign

Abstract: IMPORTANCEThe Choosing Wisely campaign consists of more than 70 lists produced by specialty societies of medical practices or procedures of minimal clinical benefit to patients in most situations, with recommendations regarding judicious use.OBJECTIVE To quantify the frequency and trends of some of the earliest Choosing Wisely recommendations using nationwide commercial health plan population-level data.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of claims data for members of Anthem-affiliated com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
319
1
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
319
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…17 However, a recent study that examined temporal ordering trends of Choosing Wisely recommendations in a large US commercial health plan found substantially higher rates of imaging for low back pain without red flags (53.7%). 19 This discrepancy is likely related to varying definitions of low-value care, but may also be influenced by differences in testing practices and populations. Although previous analyses have examined population-level data and regional variation, few studies have assessed rates of use at the level of primary care practices and variability in ordering across practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 However, a recent study that examined temporal ordering trends of Choosing Wisely recommendations in a large US commercial health plan found substantially higher rates of imaging for low back pain without red flags (53.7%). 19 This discrepancy is likely related to varying definitions of low-value care, but may also be influenced by differences in testing practices and populations. Although previous analyses have examined population-level data and regional variation, few studies have assessed rates of use at the level of primary care practices and variability in ordering across practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our study includes an entire population from a single payer, publicly funded system with no patient copayments, which is novel because most previous research on overuse has been done in the US. 16,17,19 The lower rates of cervical screening and imaging for low back pain compared with repeat DEXA scans may reflect increased penetrance of guideline recommendations and policy changes. The Ontario government amended the fee schedule to align with the guideline changes made in 2012: 20 effective January 2013, cervical cancer screening was not insured for women less than 21 or more than 70 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent report based on claims data from a national commercial health plan used population-level data to describe the impact of the campaign over a 2-to 3-year period after its introduction. 19 Overall, modest changes in behavior related to 7 topics were noted, with imaging for headaches and testing patients at low risk for cardiac disease decreasing at a statistically significant rate. It is arguable that the 1% to 2% absolute use reduction is really clinically significant.…”
Section: Barriers To Guideline-concordant Carementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Family Medicine "list of 5" low-value services of low-back pain imaging and sinusitis treatment showed no appreciable improvement in use. 19 There may, however, be greater hope for the success of interventions at a practice level. Kost et al 20 recently reported their interventions in 3 primary care residency programs.…”
Section: Barriers To Guideline-concordant Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date more than 60 different medical professional societies have participated in the campaign by creating and promoting lists of tests and treatments that physicians and patients should question. The campaign has had a broad impact in healthcare, both by increasing awareness of overutilization [1], and in some instances by triggering changes in practice [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%