2016
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.173868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early surgical intervention and its impact on patients presenting with necrotizing soft tissue infections: A single academic center experience

Abstract: Objectives:Early diagnosis and emergent surgical debridement of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) remains the cornerstone of care. We aimed to study the effect of early surgery on patients' outcomes and, in particular, on hospital length of stay (LOS) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) LOS.Materials and Methods:Over a 6-year period (January 2003 through December 2008), we analyzed the records of patients with NSTIs. We divided patients into two groups based on the time of surgery (i.e., the interval from b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the median number of debridement procedures performed per patient was two interventions, and these were comparable for both non-survivors as well as survivors. Data suggested that early surgical intervention is crucial in reducing morbidity and mortality in NF patients [ 35 ]. However, there is still a lack of clear definition on ‘How early should we be’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, the median number of debridement procedures performed per patient was two interventions, and these were comparable for both non-survivors as well as survivors. Data suggested that early surgical intervention is crucial in reducing morbidity and mortality in NF patients [ 35 ]. However, there is still a lack of clear definition on ‘How early should we be’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delay of surgical treatment of >12 h was associated with an increased number of surgical debridement, septic shock and acute renal failure [ 36 ]. Hadeed et al [ 35 ] reported outcomes of earlier surgical treatment (within the first 6 h) and found that although there was no statistically significantly difference in mortality between the study groups, higher mortality among late intervention group was clinically significant. Moreover, the outcomes in terms of the duration of hospital and intensive care unit stay were in favor of early intervention [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies suggest that early surgical intervention within 24 h post admission significantly improves the survival of patients [258,259]. Survival further increases if debridement is performed even earlier [260,261].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the early cohort (n=40) had a lower mortality of 7.5% compared with the late cohort (n=47) of 17%, it did not achieve statistical significance. 6 The issue of timing remains poorly understood and there are many confounding factors such as time to antimicrobial therapy and fluid resuscitation; however, safe practice involves rapid access to surgery.…”
Section: Evidence Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%