2014
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2014.2366712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Stopping Criteria for Energy-Efficient Low-Latency Belief-Propagation Polar Code Decoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
168
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see that the proposed decoder with M BP = 50 performs significantly better than the SC decoder and the original BP decoder. Particularly, for C 2 , at FER = 10 −4 , the performance gains for the proposed decoder with M BP = 50 is about 1.2 dB when compared to the original BP decoder with M BP = 60 and the improved BP decoders proposed in [11] and [15]. And also, compared to the SC list (SCL) decoder with the list size L = 32, the polar codes using the proposed decoder can obtain almost 0.7 dB performance gains.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We can see that the proposed decoder with M BP = 50 performs significantly better than the SC decoder and the original BP decoder. Particularly, for C 2 , at FER = 10 −4 , the performance gains for the proposed decoder with M BP = 50 is about 1.2 dB when compared to the original BP decoder with M BP = 60 and the improved BP decoders proposed in [11] and [15]. And also, compared to the SC list (SCL) decoder with the list size L = 32, the polar codes using the proposed decoder can obtain almost 0.7 dB performance gains.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, if the value of β is 7.5, the average number of BP iterations for C 1 is about 63 at the same SNR. Therefore, as in [15], to make a tradeoff between the FER performance and decoding complexity, we choose β = 0.5 when SNR <3.5 dB and β = 7.5 when SNR ≥ 3.5 dB for C 1 . For C 2 and C 3 , Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations