2022
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early step-down weaning of dairy calves from a high milk volume with glutamine supplementation

Abstract: Weaning dairy calves from a high milk volume (≥8.0 kg/d) can negatively affect the growth and welfare even if it is performed in a step-down manner. Supplementation of Gln improved gut development of preweaning calves and mitigated weaning stresses of piglets to extents achieved with antibiotics. The study objective was to examine the effect of initiating a step-down weaning scheme with a Gln supplement at an early age on calf starter intake (CSI), average daily gain (ADG), and paracellular permeability of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amino acid (AA) supplements were fed in milk over the last 3 d pre-weaning and in the first week during weaning (33 to 42 d of age). The Gln supplementation was 8.0 g/d, which was predicted to be equivalent to 1.0% of the DMI (milk solid and starter dry matter) of calves [ 13 ]. The 1.0% supplementation was chosen as Gln has been shown to improve the weaning performances of piglets with supplementations ≤1.0% of dry feed intake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Amino acid (AA) supplements were fed in milk over the last 3 d pre-weaning and in the first week during weaning (33 to 42 d of age). The Gln supplementation was 8.0 g/d, which was predicted to be equivalent to 1.0% of the DMI (milk solid and starter dry matter) of calves [ 13 ]. The 1.0% supplementation was chosen as Gln has been shown to improve the weaning performances of piglets with supplementations ≤1.0% of dry feed intake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was determined with a power analysis (power = 0.80 and α = 0.05) to capture the increase in the average SFI of calves undergoing the present weaning scheme from 0.55 [ 13 ] to 1.0 kg/d [ 10 , 11 ] given that the standard deviation of SFI was 0.36 kg/d [ 13 ]. Treatment effects on the responses of interest were determined by using the following statistical model: Y ijklm = μ + T i + P j + R k + W l + (T × P) ij + C m + e ijklm , where Y ijklm = the response variable of interest; μ = the overall mean of the response; T i = the fixed effect of the ith treatment (i = CTL, GLN, and GLNB); P j = the fixed effect of the jth period (j = pre-weaning, during weaning, and post-weaning); R k = the fixed effect of the kth parity of the dam (k = primiparous and multiparous); W l = the fixed effect of the lth week born (l = 1, 2, 3,…, 8); (T × P) ij = the fixed effect of the interaction between the ith treatment and jth period; C m = the random effect of the mth calf; and e ijklm = the random error assumed to be independent and identically distributed from a normal distribution with a mean of 0 and a variance of σ 2 (~N (0, Iσ 2 )).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations