2023
DOI: 10.1094/pdis-08-21-1650-re
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early-Stage Phenotyping of Sweet Potato Virus Disease Caused by Sweet Potato Chlorotic Stunt Virus and Sweet Potato Virus C to Support Breeding

Abstract: Sweet potato virus disease (SPVD) is a global constraint to sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) production, especially under intensive cultivation in the humid tropics such as East Africa. The objectives of this study were to develop a precision SPVD phenotyping protocol, to find new SPVD-resistant genotypes, and to standardize the first stages of screening for SPVD resistance. The first part of the protocol was based on ELISA results for sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) and sweet potato virus C (SPVC) wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ejumula was not among the high yielding varieties under San Ramon conditions, even when uninfected, so even if it's yield reduction might not be much after infection, breeders would have considered it susceptible if it yielded less than their check varieties, even if it is clearly not as susceptible as varieties grown in areas with low virus pressure such as ‘Beauregard’ ( McGregor et al, 2009 ) and ‘Benjamin’. Genotype VZ08.328, considered moderately resistant by breeders ( David et al., 2023 ) manifested as Tolerant in our experiment ( Figs. 4 and 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ejumula was not among the high yielding varieties under San Ramon conditions, even when uninfected, so even if it's yield reduction might not be much after infection, breeders would have considered it susceptible if it yielded less than their check varieties, even if it is clearly not as susceptible as varieties grown in areas with low virus pressure such as ‘Beauregard’ ( McGregor et al, 2009 ) and ‘Benjamin’. Genotype VZ08.328, considered moderately resistant by breeders ( David et al., 2023 ) manifested as Tolerant in our experiment ( Figs. 4 and 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…ELISA is mostly used for detection and/or quantification of sweetpotato viruses due to its robustness, low cost, and ease of use ( Karjeija et al., 2000b ; David et al., 2023 ). However, due to the presence of inhibitors and often low virus concentrations in sweetpotato, ELISA lacks the sensitivity needed to detect and quantify viruses for practical use and needs complementary assays for confirmation, most commonly involving grafting onto indicator plants and/or PCR ( Moyer & Salazar, 1989 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have primarily focused on laboratory-based and traditional methods for detecting sweet potato virus diseases. For example, Huang et al [48] utilized NCM-ELISA and RT-qPCR to identify plants infected with SPFMV and SPCSV viruses, while David et al [6] visually evaluated sweet potato virus symptoms using a scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (very severe symptoms). However, these methods have limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPVD can lead to more than an 85% reduction in tuber yield compared to the mild symptoms caused by individual viral infections [5]. Currently, the most effective measure to manage SPVD in farmer fields is the use of clean planting material [6]. Genetic resistance against SPVD is not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%