2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early-stage leaking pipes GPR monitoring via microwave tomographic inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is performed in Appendix A by taking advantage of the Fourier-Bessel analytical representations of the fields scattered from a metallic circular cylinder when illuminated by a filamentary current [11,23].…”
Section: A Distorted Wave Model For the Scattering From A Leaking Pipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is performed in Appendix A by taking advantage of the Fourier-Bessel analytical representations of the fields scattered from a metallic circular cylinder when illuminated by a filamentary current [11,23].…”
Section: A Distorted Wave Model For the Scattering From A Leaking Pipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst the other geophysical investigation methods [1,[3][4][5], ground penetrating radar (GPR) appears to be a promising candidate, as it allows non-invasive, cost-effective, flexible surveys to be undertaken. In fact, several examples of its application to the detection and monitoring of buried pipelines can be found in the literature [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to improve the interpretability of GPR data, inverse scattering and migration algorithms [3][4][5][6][7][8], including microwave tomography (MT) techniques [9][10][11], have also been used in different scenarios related to GPR surveys. MT has been successfully used, for example, to investigate water leakage from a large metallic pipe in [12], where it was able to give more reliable information than a direct radargram analysis. In addition, several GPR surveys at different time intervals were done for a controlled oil spill and analysed through MT in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%