2008
DOI: 10.22520/tubaar.2008.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Settlements and Precurement of Raw Materials - New Evidence Based on Research at Akanthou-Arkosykos (Tatlisu- Çi̇ftli̇kdüzü), Northern Cyprus

Abstract: Yakın zamana kadar Kıbns adası ile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests the existence of an incipient site hierarchy regarding obsidian exchange. This would explain why obsidian quantities are unusually high in some Early Neolithic sites of the southern Levant [33,34], or even in Cyprus [35], as these sites would have been privileged partners in obsidian exchange networks of the period. Interestingly, as can be observed in the mapping of the degree distribution per node in the modelled space (figure 8), though the nodes with more distant links are distributed all along the modelled space they tend to concentrate in clusters.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling and Archaeological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests the existence of an incipient site hierarchy regarding obsidian exchange. This would explain why obsidian quantities are unusually high in some Early Neolithic sites of the southern Levant [33,34], or even in Cyprus [35], as these sites would have been privileged partners in obsidian exchange networks of the period. Interestingly, as can be observed in the mapping of the degree distribution per node in the modelled space (figure 8), though the nodes with more distant links are distributed all along the modelled space they tend to concentrate in clusters.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling and Archaeological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of Shillourokambos (and Akanthou), the quantities of obsidian collected from the remaining Early Aceramic Neolithic Cypriot sites are negligible. This was previously taken to mean that obsidian was distributed to Cyprus via one primary network that linked central Anatolia to either Shillourokambos or Arkosyko, which then functioned as a re-distribution centre within Cyprus (Peltenburg, Colledge, Jackson, McCartney, & Murray, 2001;Şevketoǧlu, 2008). The inaccessibility of the Arkosyko material, inevitably, limits our interpretative ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parekklisia Shillourokambos is a large multi-period site with evidence for obsidian use dominating the earlier phases of the Early Aceramic Neolithic (Briois et al, 1997;Briois, 2011;Guilaine et al, 2002;Guilaine et al, 2011). By far the largest obsidian assemblage on Cyprus is that from Akanthou Arkosyko (Şevketoǧlu, 2008;Şevketoǧlu & Hanson, 2015) with ~5000 recorded pieces. Unfortunately, Arkosyko does not form part of this study as the recorded obsidian material was excavated after 1974 when archaeological research on the northern part of the island became illegal under international law (UNESCO Conventions 1954 and1970).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matches between our models and the archaeological data imply that Neolithic villages most probably played different roles within the obsidian exchange system, with some of them promoting regional exchange, while others were just responsible for the local distribution of the commodity. This would explain why obsidian quantities are unusually high in some Early Neolithic sites of the Southern Levant [35,36], or even in Cyprus [37], as these sites would have been privileged partners in obsidian exchange networks of the period. In fact, the role of hub in obsidian exchange seems to be related to the size of the site, which is clearly visible in the PPNB.…”
Section: Archaeological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%