Early-season movement dynamics of phytophagous pest and natural enemies across a native vegetation-crop ecotone

Abstract

A B S T R A C TThere is limited understanding about how insect movement patterns are influenced by landscape features, and how landscapes can be managed to suppress pest phytophage populations in crops. Theory suggests that the relative timing of pest and natural enemy arrival in crops may influence pest suppression. However, there is a lack of data to substantiate this claim. We investigate the movement patterns of insects from native vegetation (NV) and discuss the implications of these patterns for pest control services. Using bi-directional interception traps we quantified the number of insects crossing an NV/crop ecotone relative to a control crop/crop interface in two agricultural regions early in the growing season. We used these data to infer patterns of movement and net flux. At the community-level, insect movement patterns were influenced by ecotone in two out of three years by region combinations. At the functional-group level, pests and parasitoids showed similar movement patterns from NV very soon after crop emergence. However, movement across the control interface increased towards the end of the earlyseason sampling period. Predators consistently moved more often from NV into crops than vice versa, even after crop emergence. Not all species showed a significant response to ecotone, however when a response was detected, these species showed similar patterns between the two regions. Our results highlight the importance of NV for the recruitment of natural enemies for early season crop immigration that may be potentially important for pest suppression. However, NV was also associated with crop immigration by some pest species. Hence, NV offers both opportunities and risks for pest management. The development of targeted NV management may reduce the risk of crop immigration by pests, but not of natural enemies.Crown

Monarchs in decline: a collateral landscape‐level effect of modern agriculture

“…Convincing farmers to accept milkweed along margins will require active engagement. As has been shown in Europe, North America, and Australia, so called “nature strips” and remnant patches of native vegetation can be a valuable asset to the farming system as a whole, by providing both pollination and biological control services (e.g., Schellhorn et al ., , , ; MacFadyen et al ., ; Parry et al ., ). The Monarch Joint Venture (MJV, ) and various state‐based programs have been initiated to address the return of the monarch (e.g., in Iowa [http://monarch.ent.iastate.edu/]).…”

Spatial diversification of agroecosystems to enhance biological control and other regulating services: An agroecological perspective

“…A high configurational heterogeneity produces long interfaces between crop and non-crop areas. Such interfaces allow natural Usually not managed for enhancing pest control Bianchi et al, 2008;Gonzáles et al, 2017 enemies that overwinter in non-crop habitats to migrate into crops (Macfadyen et al, 2015).…”

Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services

“…However, there is a 6-to 8-week gap in autumn when summer crops are harvested (in late April to June) and winter crops are being planted. This gap is a critical time when beneficial arthropods are active and resources might be interrupted to the demise of their populations [4,19]. Thus, even in diverse agricultural landscapes, for example, with high proportion of forest and grassland or a diversity of crops, that are considered to harbour all necessary resources, events of resource interruptions and bottlenecks can occur [20,21].…”