Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture treated by physicians, yet there are questions regarding their optimal management. Over 200 years have been spent discussing fracture patterns, biomechanics and treatment strategies regarding DRFs. But research has revealed many controversies regarding long-held beliefs. These “common myths” have been propagated and thought of as fact but in reality, are not based on the best-available evidence. This review article aims to illustrate some of the major controversies that have come to light regarding the management of DRFs. As we strive to provide optimal care in a world of evidence-based medicine, we must shift our thinking and accept that some of the ideas we have been indoctrinated with may be flawed heuristic approach.