2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early recovery patterns of olfactory disorders in COVID-19 patients; a clinical cohort study

Abstract: Introduction A rapidly evolving evidence suggests that smell dysfunction is a common symptom in COVID-19 infection with paucity of data on its duration and recovery rate. Objectives Delineate the different patterns of olfactory disorders recovery in patients with COVID-19. Methods This cross-sectional cohort study included 96 patients with olfactory complaint confirmed to be COVID-19 positive with recent onset of anosmia. All patients were in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we did not perform a subgroup analysis regarding the olfactory recovery, but descriptive statistics suggest similar patterns of recovery in patients with allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with those recorded in the whole cohort of patients with smell loss. Most studies found no association of comorbidities with the persistence of olfactory dysfunction [ 5 , 7 ], but a recent study reported an association of comorbidities with a worse olfactory recovery in patients with allergic rhinitis, smoking, and hypertension [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we did not perform a subgroup analysis regarding the olfactory recovery, but descriptive statistics suggest similar patterns of recovery in patients with allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with those recorded in the whole cohort of patients with smell loss. Most studies found no association of comorbidities with the persistence of olfactory dysfunction [ 5 , 7 ], but a recent study reported an association of comorbidities with a worse olfactory recovery in patients with allergic rhinitis, smoking, and hypertension [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the smell and taste disorders in COVID-19 disease is still unclear. Many studies reported a quick recovery in the majority of patients [ 1 , 8 , 9 ]. However, chronic symptoms after COVID-19 disease, including persisting fatigue and loss of taste and smell, have been reported by patients even several months after the onset of the disease [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New-onset taste and smell disorders are well-recognized symptoms of COVID-19, affecting over 60% of patients [ 15 , 16 ]. SARS-CoV-2 entry is mediated via Angiotensin Coverting Enyzme 2 (ACE-2) and Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS-2) receptors present throughout the olfactory cleft, with associated inflammatory disruption of the nervous system via nasal olfactory fibers [ 17 ].…”
Section: Taste and Smellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus from these questionnaire-based reports is that olfactory function in hospitalized patients generally normalizes after 2 weeks ( 17 ). Interestingly, total recovery was seen more frequently in COVID-19 patients with sudden hyposmia than the ones with sudden anosmia ( 33 , 34 ). In a study using the UPSIT, a 40-odorant psychophysical smell test, it was determined that 8 weeks after symptom-onset, 61.0% patients had regained normal function, and that in 39.0% of cases, a degree of microsmia was retained ( 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recovery of smell loss has been assessed primarily through self-reporting and, like with prevalence reports, there is variation between reports. One study reported that 74.0% of patients experienced a resolution of anosmia at recovery ( 25 ) or within 1–3 weeks after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms ( [31] , [32] , [33] ). An approximately 80.0% recovery rate was found within 4 weeks of symptom onset ( 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%