2019
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Function After Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of echocardiographic techniques in detecting the early recovery of left ventricular (LV) function after revascularization in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In 80 consecutive patients with ACS (age 55.7 ± 9.4 years, 77% male, 15% with CCS Angina III), an echocardiographic examination of left ventricle regional wall motion abnormalities (LV RWMA), peak systolic strain rate (PSSR), peak systolic strain (PSS) and end systolic strain (ESS) was performed before and af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data interpretation: Although the wall motion score index is currently used as the conventional echocardiographic parameter for diagnosing ischemic dysfunction [25] and for diagnosing significant coronary artery stenosis (>70%) according to guidelines [26], it proved less accurate in the subset of patients we studied compared to myocardial deformation measurements. All our patients had symptoms suggestive of ischemia, probably stable angina, but we used stress echocardiography on them in order to identify the most accurate echocardiographic parameter for predicting the culprit lesion and whether they are the same as we previously found in patients with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) [27,28]. This objective was also strengthened by the underlying ischemic myocardial disease our patients had, as manifested by a reduced resting LV EF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Data interpretation: Although the wall motion score index is currently used as the conventional echocardiographic parameter for diagnosing ischemic dysfunction [25] and for diagnosing significant coronary artery stenosis (>70%) according to guidelines [26], it proved less accurate in the subset of patients we studied compared to myocardial deformation measurements. All our patients had symptoms suggestive of ischemia, probably stable angina, but we used stress echocardiography on them in order to identify the most accurate echocardiographic parameter for predicting the culprit lesion and whether they are the same as we previously found in patients with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) [27,28]. This objective was also strengthened by the underlying ischemic myocardial disease our patients had, as manifested by a reduced resting LV EF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This finding is dis concordant with other studies. 7 , 24 , 25 This might be explained by relative angle dependency and the frame-rate limitations of TDI, different ACS presentations selected in each study, and variable degrees of LV systolic impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%