1986
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<488:epcpoa>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Proterozoic Central Plains orogen: A major buried structure in the north-central United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary examination of the map suggests that many of the major Precambrian structural features, as interpreted by , Sims and Peterman (1986), Anderson and Ludvigson (1986), and others, are reflected in the trends of some of the mapped Phanerozoic structures. Other Phanerozoic structural trends do not appear to relate to any known Precambrian features.…”
Section: Mf-1835-d: Sauk Sequence Isopach and Lithofacies Mapmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A preliminary examination of the map suggests that many of the major Precambrian structural features, as interpreted by , Sims and Peterman (1986), Anderson and Ludvigson (1986), and others, are reflected in the trends of some of the mapped Phanerozoic structures. Other Phanerozoic structural trends do not appear to relate to any known Precambrian features.…”
Section: Mf-1835-d: Sauk Sequence Isopach and Lithofacies Mapmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The orogen separates two major Archean cratons, the Superior on the east and the Wyoming on the west, and represents a major constructional phase in the assembly of Laurentia (Hoffman, 1988), the North American craton. It terminates against the younger Early Proterozoic Central Plains orogen in southern South Dakota (Sims and Peterman, 1986;Bickford and others, 1986).…”
Section: -2214: Precambrian Basement Map Of the Trans-hudson Orogen mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sequences may also be separated by major unconformities. About 1.63 Ga, there was a major resetting of Rb-Sr ages and minor deformation throughout the southern Lake Superior region (Van Schmus, Thurman, and Peterman, 1975;Sims and Peterman, 1980;Van Schmus and Bickford, 1981;Peterman and others, 1985). At 1.5 Ga, the Wolf River batholith and associated anorthosite were emplaced in central Wisconsin (Van Schmus, Medaris, and Banks, 1975).…”
Section: Lake Superior Reg Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3d). This terrane, known as the Central Plains orogenic belt (Sims and Peterman, 1986), is dominated by metavolcanics and associated metavolcanics but produced felsic plutonism and vulcanism in the Trans-Hudson and Penokean belts.…”
Section: Central Plains Orogenymentioning
confidence: 99%