2003
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pregnancy threshold vaginal pH and Gram stain scores predictive of subsequent preterm birth in asymptomatic women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
41
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This pH cut of point is significant and may be relevant for screening purposes in low risk population especially for prediction of early PTL. Regarding that matter, our results are similar compared to other authors pointing vaginal pH as one of the most predictive parameter for prediction of PTL but only using a cut off pH value of 5.0 and more [21][22][23][24] . Based on our results it can be concluded that both, CL measurements and vaginal pH assessment, representing screening tests for cervical insufficiency and BV are highly specific and accurate in the screening for PTL in low risk population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pH cut of point is significant and may be relevant for screening purposes in low risk population especially for prediction of early PTL. Regarding that matter, our results are similar compared to other authors pointing vaginal pH as one of the most predictive parameter for prediction of PTL but only using a cut off pH value of 5.0 and more [21][22][23][24] . Based on our results it can be concluded that both, CL measurements and vaginal pH assessment, representing screening tests for cervical insufficiency and BV are highly specific and accurate in the screening for PTL in low risk population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The vaginal pH 5.0 (> 95 th centile) for our study population was defined as elevated and used as predictive parameter for BV. The same cut off value has been used in many other studies 11,[21][22][23] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of PTB is reported to increase considerably in women with the most antagonistic vaginal flora (i.e. Nugent score of 9 or 10 and/or vaginal pH > 5) (Hauth et al, 2003).…”
Section: Complications Associated With Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all in the same line, these aberrations were all studied form a different perspective. Most studies used Nugent's or Spiegel's score on Gram stains to detect an association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and intermediate flora with adverse pregnancy outcome (Hay et al, 1994;Elliot et al, 1990;Lee et al, 2009;Thorp et al, 2008;Cauci et al, 2002c;Hauth et al, 2003;Kekki et al, 2001;Kiss et al, Klebanoff et al, 2005;McDonald et al, 1997;Oakeshott et al, 2004;Verstraelen et al, 2007), but similar findings could be obtained with clinical Amsel criteria to diagnose BV (Honest et al, 2004;Rouse et al, 2009), abnormal lactobacillary grades on both Pap smears, gram stains, and wet mount preparations (Hay et al, 1994;Donders et al, 1993b;Mass et al, 1999;Donders et al, 2009) and with other abnormalities of the bacterial flora than full BV Donders et al, E pub ahead of print 2010;Donders et al, 2009). As is generally acknowledged, Nugent score above 7 on Gram stained specimens corresponds well with BV, and is nowadays accepted as golden standard for the diagnosis of BV in most clinical trials.…”
Section: Abnormal Vaginal Flora Subtypes In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%