2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-014-0626-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pregnancy metabolite profiling discovers a potential biomarker for the subsequent development of gestational diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, several metabolomics studies also reported the potential biomarkers for GDM by using serum [44] or hair samples [45]. Metabolomics and proteomics, based on mass spectrometry, have been widely used for exploring early diagnosis markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, several metabolomics studies also reported the potential biomarkers for GDM by using serum [44] or hair samples [45]. Metabolomics and proteomics, based on mass spectrometry, have been widely used for exploring early diagnosis markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this finding, itaconic acid has been found to be more abundant in the serum of pregnant women who subsequently developed diabetes when compared to controls with uncomplicated pregnancies. Therefore, the presence of itaconic acid may demonstrate a potential role of inflammation in early pregnancy in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (21). However, at present this is the only study that describes itaconic acid as a potential serological biomarker for inflammation.…”
Section: Itaconic Acid Secretion and Metabolism In Mammalian Cellsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Unfortunately, our data did not contain metabolic or genetic measurements, which are useful for diabetes prediction in general [19][20][21][22]. However, with a C-index of 0.75 for diabetes development after five years, the prediction performance of our risk score was almost identical to that of the Korean study, where C-indices of 0.77 and 0.74 with and without genetic markers were observed, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%