2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Prediction of Seven-Day Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Using a Machine Learning Model: Results from the SPIN-UTI Project

Abstract: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) were at higher risk of worsen prognosis and mortality. Here, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict the risk of 7-day mortality, and to test a machine learning algorithm which combines the SAPS II with additional patients’ characteristics at ICU admission. We used data from the “Italian Nosocomial Infections Surveillance in Intensive Care Units” network. Support Vector Machines (SVM) algorithm was used to classify 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the evidence supported here and elsewhere [19] suggests that HCQ treatment may be more effective in specific subtypes of Covid-19 patients and indicates machine learning as a useful approach to identify the most "promising" patients in terms of success rate of this treatment. In the future, further studies on independent datasets are warranted, possibly using supervised ML techniques as in other clinical settings (e.g., [39,40]), to validate this hypothesis and test the feasibility of predicting responsiveness to HCQ before intervention. Ideally, a trial administering low dosages of HCQ (≤400 mg/day) and randomizing subjects based on their Covid-19 subtype profile rather than on single characteristics may be warranted to clarify the effects of HCQ on mortality risk in SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially within those patients with a "low risk" profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the evidence supported here and elsewhere [19] suggests that HCQ treatment may be more effective in specific subtypes of Covid-19 patients and indicates machine learning as a useful approach to identify the most "promising" patients in terms of success rate of this treatment. In the future, further studies on independent datasets are warranted, possibly using supervised ML techniques as in other clinical settings (e.g., [39,40]), to validate this hypothesis and test the feasibility of predicting responsiveness to HCQ before intervention. Ideally, a trial administering low dosages of HCQ (≤400 mg/day) and randomizing subjects based on their Covid-19 subtype profile rather than on single characteristics may be warranted to clarify the effects of HCQ on mortality risk in SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially within those patients with a "low risk" profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we did not explore the prognostic value by combining leucine and other independent predictors of adverse outcomes in ICU. There is a strong need for improving outcome prediction by contemporary techniques such as machine learning models [27].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the main novelties of our approach concerned the analysis of HABSIs from different points of view (predictive and statistical analyses) in a cohort of 1203 patients at the level III NICU of the “Federico II” University Hospital in Naples from 2016 to 2020 (60 months). Despite different efforts in the literature for predicting the risk of HABSIs and other adverse outcomes in the ICU, these studies primarily focused on the use of Support Vector Machine (SVM) [ 16 , 17 ] or divided patients into clusters [ 18 ] without considering more recent Artificial Intelligence approaches (e.g., XGB or Catboost) or the large set of features in our analyses. Notably, our approach achieved better classification performances in accuracy and Area Under Curve (AUC) [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite different efforts in the literature for predicting the risk of HABSIs and other adverse outcomes in the ICU, these studies primarily focused on the use of Support Vector Machine (SVM) [ 16 , 17 ] or divided patients into clusters [ 18 ] without considering more recent Artificial Intelligence approaches (e.g., XGB or Catboost) or the large set of features in our analyses. Notably, our approach achieved better classification performances in accuracy and Area Under Curve (AUC) [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%