2019
DOI: 10.4018/ijirr.2019040102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Prediction of Driver's Action Using Deep Neural Networks

Abstract: Intelligent transportation systems (ITSs) are one of the most widely-discussed and researched topic across the world. The researchers have focused on the early prediction of a driver's movements before drivers actually perform actions, which might suggest a driver to take a corrective action while driving and thus, avoid the risk of an accident. This article presents an improved deep-learning technique to predict a driver's action before he performs that action, a few seconds in advance. This is considering bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the authors in [13], [24] experimentally proved that the computational models based on LSTM are the most suitable for driving behavior analysis. The LTSM architecture was also utilized in [25] to develop a driving action prediction system to predict the driver's action a few seconds in advance. The LSTM model achieved an F1-score of 92.12% compared to SVM, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN), Fusion-RNN-Exp-Loss (F-RNN-EL) models that achieved an F1-score of 65.40%, 75.72%, 85.76%, and 87.56%, respectively.…”
Section: ) Classification Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the authors in [13], [24] experimentally proved that the computational models based on LSTM are the most suitable for driving behavior analysis. The LTSM architecture was also utilized in [25] to develop a driving action prediction system to predict the driver's action a few seconds in advance. The LSTM model achieved an F1-score of 92.12% compared to SVM, Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Feed Forward Neural Networks (FFNN), Fusion-RNN-Exp-Loss (F-RNN-EL) models that achieved an F1-score of 65.40%, 75.72%, 85.76%, and 87.56%, respectively.…”
Section: ) Classification Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methodologies can be categorized based on (1) the features that can be extracted and derived from the collected data (e.g., acceleration, deceleration, and brake) [6], [11]; (2) the computational models for classifying driving behaviors [19]; (3) driving behavior outputs (e.g., normal, drowsy, or aggressive) [20], [21]; and (4) the performance metrics that evaluate these models [22], [23]. Some of these researches have experimentally proven that the computational models based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture are the most suitable for driving behavior analysis [13], [24], [25]. However, few of these studies have experimentally evaluated the accuracy of driving behavior classification models based on various time-series window sizes and sampling rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, all transportation infrastructure and driving rules are designed with human-driven vehicles in mind [82]. Some previous studies [37], [41], and [96] [47]. Additionally, the process of driver behavior cloning can be used to predict behavior in any driving situation [109].…”
Section: Adaptive Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used an in-car video assistant system to present the driver's occluded view when the driver's view is occluded by truck. An effort for driver body tracking and activity analysis, posture recognition, and action predication, have been studied in [346], [347] respectively.…”
Section: A Scholarly Cvasmentioning
confidence: 99%