2011
DOI: 10.1002/gj.1302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Precambrian mafic dyke swarms from the Central Archaean Bastar Craton, India: geochemistry, petrogenesis and tectonic implications

Abstract: The Archaean Bastar craton is known for the presence of different generations of mafic dykes. Less studied many NW-SE trending mafic dykes (intruded into the Archaean supracrustal rocks), encountered from the central part of the Bastar craton, are studied for their petrological and geochemical characteristics. There are many geological evidences which suggest emplacement of these mafic dykes in an intracratonic setting. Two distinct types of mafic dykes are recognized. Petrographically it is difficult to discr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the existence of metasomatised mantle sources beneath the Bastar Craton, since the Palaeoproterozoic time or even earlier, has been proposed in several studies (e.g. Srivastava and Singh 2004;Hussain et al 2008;Subba Rao et al 2008;Srivastava and Gautam 2012), and hence, an active continental margin setting is not required for the genesis of the Lakhna dykes. Secondly, the sedimentary basins of the craton are satisfactorily explained as intracratonic rifts (Chaudhuri et al 2002;Patranabis-Deb and Chaudhuri 2007).…”
Section: Geodynamic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, the existence of metasomatised mantle sources beneath the Bastar Craton, since the Palaeoproterozoic time or even earlier, has been proposed in several studies (e.g. Srivastava and Singh 2004;Hussain et al 2008;Subba Rao et al 2008;Srivastava and Gautam 2012), and hence, an active continental margin setting is not required for the genesis of the Lakhna dykes. Secondly, the sedimentary basins of the craton are satisfactorily explained as intracratonic rifts (Chaudhuri et al 2002;Patranabis-Deb and Chaudhuri 2007).…”
Section: Geodynamic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Rb, Sr and Ba are considered to be more mobile than Ti, Zr, Nb, Y and REE (Srivastava 2012). Zr is thought to be the most immobile element (Srivastava 2012). Present dyke and sills are not metamorphosed, but evidences of hydrothermal alteration are observed during petrographic study.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting Of Dyke and Sillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobility of elements due to metamorphism and hydrothermal alteration is a problem in amphibolite facies metamorphic condition (Rajamani et al 1989;Vijay Kumar et al 2006). Rb, Sr and Ba are considered to be more mobile than Ti, Zr, Nb, Y and REE (Srivastava 2012). Zr is thought to be the most immobile element (Srivastava 2012).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting Of Dyke and Sillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The igneous rocks are easily contaminated by wall rocks, especially at the plutonic margin (Bezard, Turner, Davidson, Macpherson, & Lindsay, 2015;Esna-Ashari, Tiepolo, Valizadeh, Hassanzadeh, & Sepahi, 2012;Kisters & Anhaeusser, 1995;Ng et al, 2015;Pesquera, Gilcrespo, Torresruiz, & Rodarobles, 2018;Stevenson et al, 2009), whereas the mafic-ultramafic magma has low viscosity, has rapid flow and cooling, and usually occurs as a narrow dyke. Contamination by the wall rocks is often neglected (Collerson & Sheraton, 1986;Srivastava & Gautam, 2012;Zhang et al, 2002). Because of the negligible assimilation, the maficultramafic dykes were often chosen as an ideal window to probe initial melt or primary magma from mantle (Bédard, 1993;Price, Russell, & Kopylova, 2000;Srivastava, Samal, & Gautam, 2015;Srivastava & Singh, 2004;Wang, Li, Wu, & Xie, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%