2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/707/2/l118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EARLY PHASE OBSERVATIONS OF EXTREMELY LUMINOUS TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA 2009dc

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
147
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than the expected Si ii and Ca ii, its early spectrum displayed high-excitation lines of Fe iii but returned to normal a few months after maximum light. But recently other SNe Ia were found which are even more luminous than SN 1991T, with decline rates that put them well above the Phillips relation by almost one magnitude in the B-band, prototypical examples being SN 2006gz and SN 2009dc [61,[90][91][92][93][94]. By now, seven objects that may belong to this subclass have been discovered and they may contribute up to about 9% of all SNe Ia [33].…”
Section: A General Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than the expected Si ii and Ca ii, its early spectrum displayed high-excitation lines of Fe iii but returned to normal a few months after maximum light. But recently other SNe Ia were found which are even more luminous than SN 1991T, with decline rates that put them well above the Phillips relation by almost one magnitude in the B-band, prototypical examples being SN 2006gz and SN 2009dc [61,[90][91][92][93][94]. By now, seven objects that may belong to this subclass have been discovered and they may contribute up to about 9% of all SNe Ia [33].…”
Section: A General Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12), we obtain the corresponding constant magnetic field B of these stars configurations. We compare these values of B with the maximum value (B max ) allowed by the virial theorem (6). For these star configurations, the results are shown in Table 1, where we also calculate the magnetic energy W B given by Eq.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the low kinetic energies as well as the high luminosity, both observed in these supernovae could be explained by the higher binding energy of a super-Chandrasekhar object 3 . In this scenario, the such white dwarf would need to have a gravitational mass lying between (2.1 − 2.8)M , depending on the model used to estimate the nickel mass, to be able to successfully explain the observed properties of the superluminous Ia supernovae [3][4][5][6][7][8] . In a recent work, considering the effect of an extremely large uniform magnetic field inside the white dwarf, Das & Banibrata obtained a new mass limit for strongly magnetized white dwarfs of 2.58M , significantly higher than the Chandrasekhar mass limit of 1.44M…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SN 2009dc is one of the overluminous Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and is estimated to have 1.2 M of 56 Ni (e.g., Yamanaka et al 2009). To explain the production of such a large mass of 56 Ni, its progenitor is proposed to be a super-Chandrasekhar-mass (super-Ch-mass) C-O white dwarf (WD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "bolometric" LCs in the observations are not truly bolometric, but cover uvoir. For SN 2009dc, the observed uvoir luminosity is assumed to be ∼1.6 the integrated BVRI one (Yamanaka et al 2009), which is common for normal SNe Ia (Wang et al 2009). Since it is still unknown whether this assumption is true for overluminous SNe Ia, BVRI LCs are compared in the following.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%