2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early peanut introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was similar to the Singapore report where 89% of participants were introduced to peanuts at the age of 10 months or later. 6,29 On whether infantile peanut introduction should be added to the Japanese Guidelines for Feeding and Weaning, our study provided no evidence that peanuts should be introduced in infancy to prevent PA, because our study showed no clear PA preventive effect of introducing peanuts in infancy. Therefore, these findings suggest that in Japan, it is not the situation to recommend the introduction of peanuts during infancy to prevent the development of PA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This was similar to the Singapore report where 89% of participants were introduced to peanuts at the age of 10 months or later. 6,29 On whether infantile peanut introduction should be added to the Japanese Guidelines for Feeding and Weaning, our study provided no evidence that peanuts should be introduced in infancy to prevent PA, because our study showed no clear PA preventive effect of introducing peanuts in infancy. Therefore, these findings suggest that in Japan, it is not the situation to recommend the introduction of peanuts during infancy to prevent the development of PA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Accordingly, screening should be limited to cases where eczema cannot be brought into remission early or where parents are too anxious to introduce a food at home. In addition, a system is needed to provide prompt access to oral food challenges to obtain a definitive diagnosis for cases where screening results are positive for sensitization [ 32 ].…”
Section: Screening For Sensitization To Food Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%