2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Paleoproterozoic felsic and mafic magmatism in the Karelian province of the Fennoscandian shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further to the south, scattered A-type intrusions dated at 2.43-2.39 Ga are found (Mikkola et al, 2010). These early Paleoproterozoic granites are small (b 100 km 2 ), discordant plutons and they were emplaced into a Mesoarchean TTG-dominated crust (see Lauri et al, 2012-…”
Section: A-type Associations Examined and Their Temporal Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further to the south, scattered A-type intrusions dated at 2.43-2.39 Ga are found (Mikkola et al, 2010). These early Paleoproterozoic granites are small (b 100 km 2 ), discordant plutons and they were emplaced into a Mesoarchean TTG-dominated crust (see Lauri et al, 2012-…”
Section: A-type Associations Examined and Their Temporal Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the predominantly felsic basement of the Belorussian High is generally poor in iron and associated metals (Pap, ). The Fennoscandian Shield is also predominantly felsic (Lahtinen, ; Lauri et al ., ), and of the three possible provinces, it is the most remote from the studied sections (Fig. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Precambrian basement of the Belorussian High is strongly dominated by gneisses and felsic intrusives with very few ores (Pap, ). The eastern Fennoscandian Shield is dominated by felsic blocks with subordinate greenstones and relatively rare mafic intrusions (Hölttä et al ., ; Lahtinen, ; Lauri et al ., ).…”
Section: Palaeogeographic Contextmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our review of literature suggests that in contrast to A2-type suites, early Paleoproterozoic (2.0-2.5 Ga) examples of A1-type suites with an OIB-like chemical signature are globally extremely rare (see Electronic Appendix F2-4), which is astonishing considering the large number of studies conducted on A-type suites worldwide (e.g., Bonin, 2007;Dall'Agnol et al, 2012;Grebennikov, 2014 and references therein). In comparison to the 2.05 Ga Otanmäki suite, most of the recorded A1-type suites (including granites and intermediate rocks and/or their volcanic equivalents) are mostly considerably younger (<1.0 Ga; see Electronic Appendix F4), with only few being older (2.44 Ga; Lauri et al, 2012;and 2.7-2.6 Ga;Zozulya et al, 2005 and references therein), and only one being similar in age (the 2.06 Ga Katugin suite, southern Siberia; Gladkochub et al, 2017;Donskaya et al, 2018). The recorded examples are located mostly in withinplate settings (oceanic or continental), either in hotspots, rift belts or triple junctions near divergent boundaries of lithospheric plates.…”
Section: Comparison With Other A-type Suitesmentioning
confidence: 99%