“…The measurement of results has mixed values at varying degrees of measuring: a priori 16 articles used the range of movement (ROM) to evaluate results in whole or in part, while the remaining 35 did not use this method, limiting themselves to assessing extension deficit results in degrees by separate joints, groups of joints (passive extension deficit [PED]), or one article even 44 The administered dose was standard in all studies, except for two studies that used double dose on the same hand at a time, 17,46 and four that used the standard dose plus the amount remaining in the vial in various formats. 39,[47][48][49] Twenty-three studies followed an injection protocol in which they allowed one to three infiltrations per joint and patient, four 25,29,38,47 studies used one or two injections, even though they followed the CORD protocols, and presumably if it were needed, they would have used three, and the rest used a protocol of one injection for an infiltration of a joint. In the studies that specified how many vials were used per joint, the mean was 1.23 (range 0.8-1.6; SD: 0.36), with only one study having used less than one vial per joint, 50 and with the studies by Gilpin 14 (1.5) and Sood 30 (1.6) being the ones that used more than one vial per joint.…”