Early origin of the bilaterian developmental toolkit

Abstract

Whole-genome sequences from the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis , the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens and the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis have confirmed results from comparative evolutionary developmental studies that much of the developmental toolkit once thought to be characteristic of bilaterians appeared much earlier in the evolution of animals. The diversity of transcription factors and signalling pathway genes in animals with a limited number of cell types and a restricted developmental repertoire is puzzling, particularly in light of claims that such highly conserved elements among bilaterians provide evidence of a morphologically complex protostome–deuterostome ancestor. Here, I explore the early origination of elements of what became the bilaterian toolkit, and suggest that placozoans and cnidarians represent a depauperate residue of a once more diverse assemblage of early animals, some of which may be represented in the Ediacaran fauna (c. 585–542 Myr ago).

Metazoan opsin evolution reveals a simple route to animal vision

“…During this same time, the K296-based RBD most likely evolved, probably through a process of neofunctionalization. Our results are compatible with the view that the last common neuralian ancestor might have been more complex than generally assumed (34).…”

The number of cell types, information content, and the evolution of complex multicellularity

“…Yet, the majority of transcription . a A two-parameter scenario for the specification of eight different cell types using five isoforms (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) of an intrinsically disordered regulatory protein (transcription factor). The two parameters are (i) a chronometer (using successive cell division cycles) and (ii) a reaction-diffusion induction system (upper right diagram) in which paired derivative cells to the right of their neighbor inhibit the formation of odd numbered isoforms and cells to the left of their derivative neighbor activate the formation of even numbered isoforms.…”

“…The number of different cell types characterizing an organism has been used to measure organismic complexity because it quantifies the extent to which cellular structure is differentiated into phenotypically different entities (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5]), because this approach is indifferent to whether an organism is a fungus, plant, or animal, and because it is insensitive to most methods of categorizing grade or clade levels of organization. It can even be used to quantify the complexity of unicellular organisms because the vast majority of species with this body plan achieve different cell functionalities and morphologies at different stages in their life cycles (e.g., resting cysts versus actively motile cells).…”

Feedback regulation ofDrosophilaBMP signaling by the novel extracellular protein Larval Translucida

“…However, beside the tissue-specific transcriptional response, both intra-and extracellular modulation of signaling activity also play a crucial role in determining the response to most, if not all, secreted signals. Indeed, while core components of signaling systems are highly conserved throughout evolution (Erwin, 2009), a broad spectrum of regulators can shape contextspecific activity. Drosophila BMPs, for example, perform multiple functions throughout development, and are subjected to contextand developmental stage-specific extracellular regulation (Umulis et al, 2009).…”