2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early operant learning is unaffected by socio-economic status and other demographic factors: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used contingency learning as a vehicle to examine individual differences in young infants' vagal tone in relation to learning status. The behavioral response of Day 1 and Day 2 Learners was consistent with previous reports (Crossman et al, 2009) and was unaffected by social demographic variables, consistent with a recent meta-analysis (Gerhardstein, Dickerson, Miller, & Hipp, 2012). Given this learning difference, we asked two questions: (1) Is lower baseline vagal tone related to learner status and/or to maternal reports of infant temperament; and (2) when infants don't respond to a contingency within a single session, do their vagal tone levels during the session differ from those who do?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This study used contingency learning as a vehicle to examine individual differences in young infants' vagal tone in relation to learning status. The behavioral response of Day 1 and Day 2 Learners was consistent with previous reports (Crossman et al, 2009) and was unaffected by social demographic variables, consistent with a recent meta-analysis (Gerhardstein, Dickerson, Miller, & Hipp, 2012). Given this learning difference, we asked two questions: (1) Is lower baseline vagal tone related to learner status and/or to maternal reports of infant temperament; and (2) when infants don't respond to a contingency within a single session, do their vagal tone levels during the session differ from those who do?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…While SES is linked to memory skill by the start of school (Noble et al, 2007) and indeed, socioeconomic disparities in memory skill extend across the lifespan (Stern, Albert, Tang, & Tsai, 1999), findings have been inconsistent concerning disparities in memory development earlier in childhood. Historically, relations between SES and infant novelty preference were inconsistent (Fagan & Singer, 1983; O’Connor, Cohen, & Parmelee, 1984; Rose & Wallace, 1985), and a recent meta-analysis reported no evidence of SES differences in infant operant conditioning (Gerhardstein, Dickerson, Miller, & Hipp, 2012). Thus, although hippocampally mediated declarative memory skill emerges over the first 2 years of life (Barr et al, 1996; Barr, Walker, Gross, & Hayne, 2013), the extent to which individual differences in memory development can be explained by SES at these early ages requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent technological developments enabling more sensitive measurements have led to a renewed interest in individual differences in the learning and retention abilities of infants in the mobile paradigm. Given that previous reports have indicated that not all infants can learn the contingency in the mobile paradigm (Gerhardstein et al, 2012;Jacquey et al, 2020a), investigating behavioral differences between learners and non-learners has gained importance. In a study in which the mobile was activated only if the target leg exceeded a virtual threshold, infants who were able to learn the task exhibited different movement kinematics (e.g., less in-phase hip-knee coordination) compared to non-learners during the acquisition phase (Sargent et al, 2015).…”
Section: Recent Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%