1999
DOI: 10.14430/arctic940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Occupations and Cultural Sequence at Moose Creek: A Late Pleistocene Site in Central Alaska

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Early investigations at the Moose Creek site in 1979 and 1984 recovered stone tools within and below paleosol stringers dated between 8160 ± 260 14 C yr BP and 11 730 ± 250 14 C yr BP. Although questions remained regarding the absence of diagnostic artifacts and the validity of the radiocarbon dates obtained from soil organics, this assemblage was tentatively assigned to the Nenana complex. Excavations at the site were resumed in 1996 in hopes of solving persisting problems associated with the cultur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only identifiable faunal remains are weathered tooth fragments of elk and sheep from Dry Creek. [65][66][67] At least two localities in the Tanana Basin may contain occupations that date to this time interval, but their dating is problematic. An artifact assemblage similar to those found in the Nenana Valley was discovered at Chugwater near Fairbanks.…”
Section: Beringian Sites Of the Late Glacial Thermal Maximummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only identifiable faunal remains are weathered tooth fragments of elk and sheep from Dry Creek. [65][66][67] At least two localities in the Tanana Basin may contain occupations that date to this time interval, but their dating is problematic. An artifact assemblage similar to those found in the Nenana Valley was discovered at Chugwater near Fairbanks.…”
Section: Beringian Sites Of the Late Glacial Thermal Maximummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goebel et al's (1991) study has been cited on many occasions. Some of the researchers who have cited the study disagree with its conclusions (e.g., Bradley and Stanford, 2004;Dumond, 2001;Meltzer, 2004;Stanford and Bradley, 2002), but the majority appear to accept them (e.g., Bever, 2001aBever, ,b, 2006Boldurian and Cotter, 1999;Dixon, 2001;Fiedel, 2000Fiedel, , 2006Goebel, 1999Goebel, , 2004Haynes, 2002Haynes, , 2005Hoffecker, 2001;Holmes, 2001;Pearson, 1999Pearson, , 2001Roosevelt et al, 2002;Straus et al, 2005;Yesner et al, 2004). In addition, Goebel et al's (1991) conclusions have been incorporated into a number of subsequent influential studies (e.g., Hoffecker et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sluiceway complex is typified by convex bases but, compared with the USR points, are generally longer, wider, and thicker with a distinct diamond-shaped cross-section (41). However, the USR specimens are similar in dimension and basal form to various Denali complex points, including Dry Creek Component 2, Moose Creek Component 2, Panguingue Creek Component 1, Sparks Point, and Whitmore Ridge in Alaska and Little Arm Phase of the American Paleoarctic tradition in the Yukon Territory (13,37,(42)(43)(44)(45). Given these comparisons and the widespread distribution of Denali complex (or American Paleoarctic tradition) throughout interior eastern Beringia in 12,500-6000 cal B.P.…”
Section: Grave Goodsmentioning
confidence: 98%