2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early neurological deterioration represents recurrent attack in acute small non-lacunar stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different results from the report by Matsumoto et al [35] showed that neurological deterioration occurred in 6 of 46 patients within the first 7 days after stroke and 4 of them had new acute ischemic lesions. However, they included patients with other kinds of etiology, such as atrial fibrillation and aortic complicated plaque which tended to cause large wedge-shaped infarction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Different results from the report by Matsumoto et al [35] showed that neurological deterioration occurred in 6 of 46 patients within the first 7 days after stroke and 4 of them had new acute ischemic lesions. However, they included patients with other kinds of etiology, such as atrial fibrillation and aortic complicated plaque which tended to cause large wedge-shaped infarction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…First at all, a new stroke may occur in the same arterial territory. In fact, very early recurrence in the same arterial territory has been strongly related to a high-grade arterial stenosis [30,31,32]. A second mechanism could be the increase in the penumbra area related to reduced hemodynamic flow, thus making neurons in this area more susceptible to other adverse clinical and biological factors such as blood pressure [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases this fact clearly represents a recurrent event; in lacunar strokes with only 1 acute lesion, however, the concrete pathophysiology of deterioration is unclear. [32][33] Our methodology could, therefore, have overestimated the recurrence rate. Nevertheless, we chose this definition in spite of the clinical interest in identifying all events that represent a poor neurological evolution.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%