2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early neurologic assessment in preterm-infants: Integration of traditional neurologic examination and observation of general movements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, preterm infants without intracranial lesions can exhibit less flexor tone in limbs and increased extensor tone in the neck compared to term infants[4042]. While sensitive and specific evaluations of movement in infancy such as the Assessment of General Movements can effectively differentiate between the effects of prematurity and other neurologic conditions[4346], they require access to either highly specialized providers or resources[4749]. Until further maturation has occurred, it may be difficult for a non-specialized pediatric provider to differentiate increased abnormal tone due to mild CP rather than due to complications of prematurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, preterm infants without intracranial lesions can exhibit less flexor tone in limbs and increased extensor tone in the neck compared to term infants[4042]. While sensitive and specific evaluations of movement in infancy such as the Assessment of General Movements can effectively differentiate between the effects of prematurity and other neurologic conditions[4346], they require access to either highly specialized providers or resources[4749]. Until further maturation has occurred, it may be difficult for a non-specialized pediatric provider to differentiate increased abnormal tone due to mild CP rather than due to complications of prematurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best known methods are the Dubowitz assessment for neonates (79) and its adaptation for older infants, the Hammersmith infant neurological examination [HINE (80)], the Prechtl assessment for newborns (65) and its adaptation for older infants, the Touwen infant neurological examination [TINE (75, 81)], and the assessment according to Amiel-Tison (82). Predictive validity of these assessments is generally good (82), with an estimated sensitivity and specificity for CP of 88–92%, respectively (77).…”
Section: Early Diagnostics In Cpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of 15 studies on the predictive value of fidgety movements reported a sensitivity > 91% and a specificity > 81% [18]. The most comprehensive study so far, in which more than 900 children participated, yielded a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 94% [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%