Acute kidney injury (AKI) has attracted considerable attention with the recognition that even small changes in renal function may have profound effects on major outcomes, regardless of the setting. Despite advances in diagnosis and staging of AKI (1) with emerging biomarkers informing our knowledge of mechanisms and pathways, we do not as yet know how AKI contributes to the increased mortality and morbidity in hospitalized patients. We have blamed the lack of progress in this area on the heterogeneity of the population and disease mechanisms coupled with difficulties in ascertaining the attributable risk, particularly when AKI is a component of multiorgan failure. However, several pieces of evidence now suggest that we should consider additional process of care factors that may influence a patient's course and outcomes. Data from the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) audit of 564 patients who died with a diagnosis of AKI in United Kingdom hospitals revealed significant gaps in performance for management of AKI, with over 50% of cases failing to meet criteria for good care, and only 30% of those who developed AKI in the hospital meeting these criteria (2). In 12% of cases, there was delayed recognition, 29% had inadequate assessment of risk factors, and both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were subject to poor performance in a significant number of patients. The level of prior training of the physician influenced the quality of care, and senior physicians were deemed to provide better care. Only 31% of patients were referred to a nephrologist for advice or management support, whereas an additional 20% were considered as having needed nephrology support. 21% of the referrals to nephrology were considered by the advisors to be delayed. We have previously shown in a prospective observational study that delayed nephrology consultation (Ͼ48 hours from AKI diagnosis) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) was associated with increased mortality and morbidity (3). Similarly, reported that an increase of Ͼ100% in serum creatinine level at the time of nephrology consultation was associated with higher mortality and impaired renal recovery on discharge. Most recently, Ponce et al. (5) have confirmed these findings in 148 ICU patients with AKI at a Brazilian teaching hospital. Nephrology consultation was delayed (Ն48 hours) in 62.3%, which was associated with increased ICU mortality (65.4% versus 88.2%, P Ͻ 0.001). These studies support the notion that early nephrology involvement in managing AKI may improve outcomes but raises several questions: what determines when a nephrologist is involved, what is the optimal time for nephrology involvement, and what is the nephrologist's role?The study from Meier et al. (6) in this issue of CJASN provides additional information on some of these issues detailing the management of AKI in a large tertiary care academic hospital in Switzerland. The authors characterized the care of 4296 noncritically ill patients who experienc...