1985
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(85)90332-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early monitoring of human renal transplantations by isoenzyme activities in urines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between AGR and ATN group was not statistically significant. These results are also supported by earlier reports, which suggest that excretion of NAG and its isoenzyme fails to identify a specific cause of increased enzymuria in patients after renal transplantation [13][14][15]. Independently of the elevated NAG excretion, increased excretion of brush border enzymes-AAP and GGT were observed in AGR and ATN groups in the early post-transplant period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between AGR and ATN group was not statistically significant. These results are also supported by earlier reports, which suggest that excretion of NAG and its isoenzyme fails to identify a specific cause of increased enzymuria in patients after renal transplantation [13][14][15]. Independently of the elevated NAG excretion, increased excretion of brush border enzymes-AAP and GGT were observed in AGR and ATN groups in the early post-transplant period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…NAG-B isoenzyme has been used in determining the source of increased enzymuria. Contrary to NAG, released also from degranulated neutrophils [1,2], NAG-B specifically originates from the kidney [13]. In our study the NAG and NAG-B excretion was significantly higher in AGR and ATN groups than in SGF patients; the highest NAG and NAG-B excretion was observed in the AGR group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…of cells x 153/125 x 104) to give the total cells/ml. 4 Cell samples were cytocentrifuged at 900 rpm for 2 minutes, fixed, stained with Dif-Quick Stain (Baxter, McGraw Park, IL), coverslipped using permount, and examined microscopically under oil at 1000x magnification. Differential cell counts were obtained by counting 100 cells and marking the cells as macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, or other cells [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bourbouze et al [ 13] stud ied 41 episodes of acute rejection after renal transplantation and confirmed that urinary NAG is a useful indicator of rejection but since there was a positive correlation be tween total NAG and NAG B the measure ments of isoenzymes did not seem to provide additional information in the early monitor ing of renal transplantation patients. Yuen et al [14] found in their study on 20 renal transplant patients an increased urinary NAG activity in stable renal transplant pa tients with a normal isoenzyme profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last 5 years there have been a few reports [12][13][14][15][16] describing possible clini cal utility of NAG isoenzyme analysis. The separation of NAG A and NAG B has been performed by ion-exchange chromatography or isoelectric focusing, which both are time consuming and not easily adapted to use in clinical routine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%