The Handbook of the History of English
DOI: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Middle English Dialectology: Problems and Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due caution must be exercised when taking mediæval sources to faithfully represent the diachronic ancestor of vernacular varieties attested in the modern era (cf. Laing & Lass ); it would appear, nevertheless, that at least some modern forms with sonorant deletion in fact descend from forms with epenthesis. This is certainly the assumption of Russell () and Schrijver (), who both suggest that the svarabhakti vowel was deleted at a late (late Middle or even early Modern Welsh) date, followed by regular deletion that only affected [r] after coronals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due caution must be exercised when taking mediæval sources to faithfully represent the diachronic ancestor of vernacular varieties attested in the modern era (cf. Laing & Lass ); it would appear, nevertheless, that at least some modern forms with sonorant deletion in fact descend from forms with epenthesis. This is certainly the assumption of Russell () and Schrijver (), who both suggest that the svarabhakti vowel was deleted at a late (late Middle or even early Modern Welsh) date, followed by regular deletion that only affected [r] after coronals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McIntosh et al (1986) provides invaluable maps for a number of high-frequency, closed-class lexical items in later ME. The wealth of data provided by the Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English offers the tantalizing prospect of being able to push such work further even for one of the periods most affected by paucity of sources (see especially Laing & Lass 2006), although whether the extant sources are sufficient to analyse word geography for any but the highest-frequency words remains to be tested in detail. Work that is not driven (solely) by philological analysis of morphological or phonological criteria has had some success in identifying regional trends with regard to type frequency of loanwords of different origins (especially Scandinavian) in ME 316 P H I L I P D U R K I N and in later dialects.…”
Section: The Nature Of the Data And The Problems This Presentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information about the LAEME corpus and the principles of tagging can be found in the LAEME website (Laing and Lass 2008, Introduction, Chapters 3 and 4), and in Laing and Lass (2006). More information about the LAEME corpus and the principles of tagging can be found in the LAEME website (Laing and Lass 2008, Introduction, Chapters 3 and 4), and in Laing and Lass (2006).…”
Section: $Thought/nod_yotmentioning
confidence: 99%