2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0774-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Mandibular Distraction to Relieve Robin Severe Airway Obstruction in Two Siblings with Lymphedema–Distichiasis Syndrome

Abstract: Although micrognathia and cleft palate have been reported in patients with Lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome (LDS), the classic Robin sequence with glossoptosis and airway obstruction has not been previously described in patients with genetically confirmed LDS. Here we report on two female siblings with LDS confirmed by a FOXC2 mutation who presented at birth with severe airway obstruction related to Robin sequence. Respiratory obstruction was successfully managed by early distraction osteogenesis. Our report h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, the efficacy of distraction is less clear in sPRS patients with more severe syndromes with additional comorbidities such as Smith-Lemli-Optiz or otopalatodigitial syndrome. 13,18,19 Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between our 2 cohorts in terms of age at time of distraction, AO, etc (Table 1), factors that may have confounded analysis were controlled for. Results regarding the quantification of mandibular morphology and airway morphological changes, palatoplasty, or other medical comorbidities were beyond the scope of this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That said, the efficacy of distraction is less clear in sPRS patients with more severe syndromes with additional comorbidities such as Smith-Lemli-Optiz or otopalatodigitial syndrome. 13,18,19 Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between our 2 cohorts in terms of age at time of distraction, AO, etc (Table 1), factors that may have confounded analysis were controlled for. Results regarding the quantification of mandibular morphology and airway morphological changes, palatoplasty, or other medical comorbidities were beyond the scope of this analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nonetheless, surgical success was not statistically different between the 2 groups (for iPRS cohort vs for sPRS cohort, P = 0.0) and demonstrates that although the iPRS group has a higher success rate, the success rate for the sPRS group is still highly acceptable (Table 3). That said, the efficacy of distraction is less clear in sPRS patients with more severe syndromes with additional comorbidities such as Smith-Lemli-Optiz or otopalatodigitial syndrome 13,18,19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation