Early Management of Infants With Robin Sequence: An International Survey and Algorithm

Abstract

There is no widely accepted protocol for management of infants with Robin sequence (RS) who present with airway obstruction and feeding impairment. The purposes of this study were to evaluate diagnostic and treatment preferences of clinicians from the United States and non-US countries and to use these data to propose an algorithm for early management of infants with RS.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was implemented using a survey, which was distributed to craniofacial surgeons and non-surgeon physicians involved in management of infants with RS. Predictor variables were nationality, specialty, and surgical volume. Outcome variables included survey responses regarding preferences for evaluation and early treatment of patients with RS. A diagnostic and early treatment algorithm was proposed based on the most common survey responses. Descriptive and analytic statistics were calculated and a P less than .05 was considered significant.Results: A total of 275 responses were received and 82 were excluded, leaving a final sample of 193 participants: 155 (80%) surgeons and 38 (20%) non-surgeon physicians. Thirty-seven US states were represented by 143 (74%) respondents and 50 (26%) participants were from 19 non-US countries. There were 96 (50%) low-volume and 97 (50%) high-volume respondents. There was general agreement in methods for evaluation and early treatment among respondents; the only significant differences were 1) US surgeons operate earlier to address airway obstruction than those from other countries (P = .001), 2) high-volume providers tend to operate earlier (P = .017) and to choose mandibular distraction more frequently (P = .003) than low-volume respondents, and 3) mandibular distraction is the preferred operation in the United States, but several operations for airway improvement are used equally in non-US countries (P < .001). Conclusion:Despite variation in the evaluation and treatment of infants with RS, this international and multispecialty survey showed trends that could represent best practices. An algorithm based on these findings is proposed.

Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Does Not Increase Inpatient Complications

“…These temporizing options are appropriate when mild anatomic differences can be compensated through catch-up growth. Tongue-lip adhesion is a relatively safe procedure that tethers the anterior tongue to the lower lip; however, it has fallen out of favor at some centers due to inconsistent outcomes (Resnick et al, 2019). Tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube insertion are the gold standards for definitively bypassing both supraglottic and subglottic obstruction, but their associated morbidity restricts their routine use.…”

Is Intensive Care Unit Admission Necessary After Removal of Mandibular Distraction Devices in Infants With Robin Sequence?

“…Mandibular distraction osteogenesis has been shown to significantly improve or cure OA (Resnick et al, 2019), simplify laryngoscopy and intubation (Heffernan et al, 2019), and improve feeding (Ghoul et al, 2018) in infants with RS. Direct laryngoscopy and intubation at the time of the initial operation to perform the mandibular osteotomies and place the distraction devices is often extremely challenging due to unfavorable facial and airway anatomy.…”

Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Infants During the First Year of Life: What the Pediatrician Needs to Know

“…A recent international survey showed wide variation of management of these infants. 47 A 2016 consensus report recommended endoscopic airway evaluation to confirm glossoptosis and diagnose concomitant airway abnormalities. If concomitant abnormalities cannot be corrected, then tracheostomy is recommended.…”