2012
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Loss of Pericytes and Perivascular Stromal Cell-Induced Scar Formation after Stroke

Abstract: Despite its limited regenerative capacity, the central nervous system (CNS) shares more repair mechanisms with peripheral tissues than previously recognized. Scar formation is a ubiquitous healing mechanism aimed at patching tissue defects via the generation of fibrous extracellular matrix (ECM). This process, orchestrated by stromal cells, can unfavorably affect the capacity of tissues to restore function. Vascular mural cells have been found to contribute to scarring after spinal cord injury. In the case of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
235
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
29
235
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10 Moreover, endothelial cells were more readily detectable as a component of the microvascular structure than pericytes within infarct areas on day 1 after pMCAO ( Figure 2C), indicating that pericytes may be more vulnerable to ischemia than endothelial cells, as reported previously. 17,34 It should be kept in mind that cellular components that are potential therapeutic targets may be changing during the course of brain ischemia because of different ischemic vulnerabilities.…”
Section: Reperfusion and Ischemic Vulnerability Of Cellular Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8,10 Moreover, endothelial cells were more readily detectable as a component of the microvascular structure than pericytes within infarct areas on day 1 after pMCAO ( Figure 2C), indicating that pericytes may be more vulnerable to ischemia than endothelial cells, as reported previously. 17,34 It should be kept in mind that cellular components that are potential therapeutic targets may be changing during the course of brain ischemia because of different ischemic vulnerabilities.…”
Section: Reperfusion and Ischemic Vulnerability Of Cellular Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 It is known that poststroke functional recovery can be brought about by the reorganization of neuronal networks in some brain areas, including in peri-infarct regions, in both animals and human, although there are some differences between them. [15][16][17] Histologically, in peri-infarct area, there is an accumulation of reactive astrocytes expressing high levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), forming astrogliosis in both animals and human. 17,18 It has been recently reported that poststroke astrogliosis may aid neuronal survival, 18 axonal growth, 19 and remyelination 20 in peri-infarct areas in experimental researches, although this remains controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may thus be that the decreased activity of caspase 3/7 in response to monomer Aβ1‐40 seen in our study contributes to both the increased cell viability and the increased cell division. Finally, it is important to point out that cell cultures can never replicate a biological system and although pericyte proliferation does occur in the human brain (Fernandez‐Klett et al., 2013; Goritz et al., 2011; Matsushita et al., 2015; Paul et al., 2012), the conditions and rate in the brain are not comparable to the same in a Petri dish. Hence, we would like to stress that our cell model is useful foremost as a tool to demonstrate that differences in pericyte response to Aβ depend on both aggregation form and specie.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DM, mitochondrial oxidative stress leads to both endothelial cell damage as well as pericyte depletion and BBB leakage 44. In the minutes to hours following ischemia, endothelial swelling and pericytes mediate capillary constriction, which is followed by rapid pericyte death leading to irreversible constriction of capillaries and BBB damage 34, 45…”
Section: Blood–brain Barrier Disruption In Diabetic Strokementioning
confidence: 99%