2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early life adversity drives sex-specific anhedonia and meningeal immune gene expression through mast cell activation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results are not consistent with a recent report demonstrating that the combination of early life MS with early weaning increases susceptibility to adult-stress-induced changes in the sucrose preference test ( Duque-Wilckens et al, 2022 ). There are many procedural differences between these studies that likely explain the apparent discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The current results are not consistent with a recent report demonstrating that the combination of early life MS with early weaning increases susceptibility to adult-stress-induced changes in the sucrose preference test ( Duque-Wilckens et al, 2022 ). There are many procedural differences between these studies that likely explain the apparent discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Several prior studies in rodents have also supported the stress inoculation hypothesis by reporting protective effects of brief or mild ELS ( Hsiao et al, 2016 ; Calpe-Lopez et al, 2022 ). However, other studies have suggested that similar ELS procedures promote susceptibility to subsequent stressors ( Pena et al, 2017 ; Hultman et al, 2018 ; Duque-Wilckens et al, 2022 ). The reasons for these disparate outcomes following ELS and adult stress are not known, but they could involve unidentified genetic (or other) factors, consistent with the three-hit-hypothesis of vulnerability vs. resilience ( Daskalakis et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations