2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

111
547
18
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 680 publications
(691 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
111
547
18
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the spatial relation between the facial contour and features was intact, the configural distortion may engage additional analytic processing of face perception in the IT area. However, the amplitudes at T5 and T6 electrodes were larger for Inverted and Scrambled than for Upright, although there were no significant differences among Upright, Inverted and Scrambled, different from previous N170 studies (George et al 1996;Rossion et al 2003). Therefore, we considered that amplitude differences among Upright, Inverted and Scrambled conditions were weak compared with previous ERPs, probably because of a latency jitter between trials and/or subjects, although this cannot be confirmed from the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if the spatial relation between the facial contour and features was intact, the configural distortion may engage additional analytic processing of face perception in the IT area. However, the amplitudes at T5 and T6 electrodes were larger for Inverted and Scrambled than for Upright, although there were no significant differences among Upright, Inverted and Scrambled, different from previous N170 studies (George et al 1996;Rossion et al 2003). Therefore, we considered that amplitude differences among Upright, Inverted and Scrambled conditions were weak compared with previous ERPs, probably because of a latency jitter between trials and/or subjects, although this cannot be confirmed from the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, activities in the primary visual areas are evoked by the change in luminance, regardless of the stimulus shape. (2) The generator source of N170 has not yet been confirmed, although some regions such as the superior temporal sulcus (STS), inferior temporal (IT) area, and other surrounding regions are candidates, as reported in previous studies (Bötzel et al 1995;Herrmann et al 2005;Itier and Taylor 2004c;Mnatsakanian and Tarkka 2004;Pizzagalli et al 2002;Rossion et al 2003;Schweinberger et al 2002;Shibata et al 2002;Taylor et al 2001;Watanabe et al 2003); however, N170 could be contaminated with activity generated in the primary visual cortex, as described above. The source of M170 in previous MEG studies is considered to be only the IT area, since only the tangential dipole can be recorded by MEG (Deffke et al 2007;Halgren et al 2000;Linkenkaer-Hansen et al 1998;Sams et al 1997;Swithenby et al 1998;Tanskanen et al 2005;Watanabe et al 1999a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, these low-level perceptual factors should be controlled in studies of number evoked brain activity. Second, the dissociable data pattern of our electrophysiological results on the N170 and VPP components is contradictive with the N170/VPP association hypothesis (Joyce & Rossion, 2005;Rossion et al, 2003). Finally, most importantly, based on the present symbolic effect, it still cannot be decided whether the effect of symbolic type in VPP latency should be due to differential neural processing with respect to notation-specific identification processing or other subsequent processes.…”
Section: What Is Symbol Effect and Why?contrasting
confidence: 70%
“…We had two main hypotheses: first, we reasoned that if the distance effect in the P2p time window reflected the early number-specific processing, the numerical distance should not affect the ERPs during the N170 time window (e.g., N170 and VPP). Second, we expected that if the N170 and VPP elicited by numbers are manifestations of the same neural generators (Joyce & Rossion, 2005;Rossion, Joyce, Cottrell, & Tarr, 2003), then they should present identical functional response. In order to test these two hypotheses, we attempted to determine the time range in which number-magnitude representation is accessed, with an emphasis on these early components (e.g., N170 and VPP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitudes of the N170 have been found to be approximately symmetrical (Rossion et al, 2003), despite the well-known differential involvement of both hemispheres in face processing (reviewed in Damásio et al (1990)). We hypothesize that patients with inferior occipital epileptic foci will show a smaller N170 in the affected hemisphere when compared with the spared one and that the resulting inter-hemispheric asymmetry will provide useful neurophysiologic information about the localization of epileptic foci involving the inferior part of the occipital lobes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%