2022
DOI: 10.1002/oa.3154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Iron Age cavalry? Evidence of oral and thoracolumbar pathologies on possible warhorses from Iron Age, Denmark

Abstract: This article presents paleopathological analyses of six adult male Iron Age horses (4th century BC to 5th century AD) found in association with large amounts of ritually deposited warrior paraphernalia including horse tack. Pathological lesions have been observed on all six horses. The observed pathologies can be divided into three major categories: oral pathologies including abnormal dental wear, spinal pathologies and trauma, and pathologies of the limb bones. Some of the observed pathologies (e.g., cranial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this issue, Kveiborg and Nørgaard (2022) present detailed palaeopathological evaluation of six Iron Age horses from Denmark found in association with ritually deposited warrior paraphernalia, including large amounts of weaponry and horse harnesses. Based on their context and treatment, these horses are believed to have belonged to defeated armies-all were directly associated with weaponry depositions and had been subject to similar ritual destruction as seen in the weaponry.…”
Section: They Fought On Horseback Didn't They?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this issue, Kveiborg and Nørgaard (2022) present detailed palaeopathological evaluation of six Iron Age horses from Denmark found in association with ritually deposited warrior paraphernalia, including large amounts of weaponry and horse harnesses. Based on their context and treatment, these horses are believed to have belonged to defeated armies-all were directly associated with weaponry depositions and had been subject to similar ritual destruction as seen in the weaponry.…”
Section: They Fought On Horseback Didn't They?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long-view, it is also clear that shifting cultural practices, evolving phenotypes, specifics of use and associated technology means that 'warhorses' are also not a static entity through time, and thus the pathological changes registered in their skeleton may not be similar either. It is in this context that the study of Kveiborg and Nørgaard (2022) also has great value. The pathological studies they present can be tied closely to a tight archaeological context and artifactual record in terms of harness equipment, to provide a useful control dataset for comparison to other archaeological records.…”
Section: They Fought On Horseback Didn't They?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of equine dental pathology in archaeology contributes to the main topic of appearance and use of different types and materials of bridle and bits, mainly during early horse domestication. Considering the importance of horses as human companions throughout prehistory and history, it is not surprising that the topics of teeth and oral pathology associated with bite damage, along with back problems in horses often appear in the paleopathological literature (e.g., Bartosiewicz & Gál, 2013; Bendrey, 2007a, 2007b, 2011; Bulatović et al, 2014; Kveiborg & Nørgaard, 2022; Levine, 1999; Olsen, 2003, 2006; Outram et al, 2009; Taylor et al, 2021; Taylor & Tuvshinjargal, 2018). Less frequent are studies on the origin and development of oral pathology in light of past horse management practices (e.g., Bartosiewicz & Gál, 2013; Bendrey, 2014; Cross, 2018; Pasicka et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%