2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early invasive vs. selectively invasive management for acute coronoary syndromes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent guidelines recommend an early, invasive treatment strategy for patients with high or intermediate risk unstable angina pectoris or Review non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [Bassand et al 2007]. These recommendations are based on the results from 3 large, randomized trials (FRISC II (30% women), RITA 3 (38% women), and TACTICS TIMI 18 (35% women)) [Clayton et al 2004;Cannon et al 2001;Lagerqvist et al 2001], while a fourth trial (ICTUS, 26% women) was not able to demonstrate a benefit of a routine, invasive strategy over a selective, ischemia-guided, invasive strategy [de Winter et al 2005].…”
Section: Non St-elevation Acute Coronary Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent guidelines recommend an early, invasive treatment strategy for patients with high or intermediate risk unstable angina pectoris or Review non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [Bassand et al 2007]. These recommendations are based on the results from 3 large, randomized trials (FRISC II (30% women), RITA 3 (38% women), and TACTICS TIMI 18 (35% women)) [Clayton et al 2004;Cannon et al 2001;Lagerqvist et al 2001], while a fourth trial (ICTUS, 26% women) was not able to demonstrate a benefit of a routine, invasive strategy over a selective, ischemia-guided, invasive strategy [de Winter et al 2005].…”
Section: Non St-elevation Acute Coronary Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%