2016
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by practice nurse and GP teams: a cluster randomized trial

Abstract: Intervention uptake was low and had no additional beneficial effect, over usual care, on participants' health-related QoL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our diagnostic yield was only slightly lower than that obtained from screening programs utilized within Australian general practice settings (18%). 32 Recent data in primary care reiterate systematic issues in the Australian primary care setting, such as a reactive and relatively delayed approach to diagnosis. 33 Although cost-effectiveness analysis of the case-finding protocol was not attempted, our use of pharmacy-delivered microspirometry (instead of conventional spirometry), referring only those with high risk of COPD for onward GP review and diagnosis (instead of physicians undertaking the entire process from screening to diagnosis), the brevity of the case-finding protocol and the online modes (instead of face to face) of pharmacist training may render this model of COPD case detection more economic than conventional GP-based screening models where the onus of identifying, screening and testing potential COPD cases falls entirely upon the increasingly busy practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our diagnostic yield was only slightly lower than that obtained from screening programs utilized within Australian general practice settings (18%). 32 Recent data in primary care reiterate systematic issues in the Australian primary care setting, such as a reactive and relatively delayed approach to diagnosis. 33 Although cost-effectiveness analysis of the case-finding protocol was not attempted, our use of pharmacy-delivered microspirometry (instead of conventional spirometry), referring only those with high risk of COPD for onward GP review and diagnosis (instead of physicians undertaking the entire process from screening to diagnosis), the brevity of the case-finding protocol and the online modes (instead of face to face) of pharmacist training may render this model of COPD case detection more economic than conventional GP-based screening models where the onus of identifying, screening and testing potential COPD cases falls entirely upon the increasingly busy practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of the Australian population visit their general practitioner (GP) more than once a year 7 , general practice offers the continuity of care needed for interventions aimed at enhancing patients' self-management of chronic disease. With practice nurses (PNs) increasingly contributing to chronic disease management, nurse-delivered self-management support for coordinated care of patients with COPD could lead to significant uptake of interventions shown to improve health outcomes such as smoking cessation, pulmonary rehabilitation and influenza vaccination 8,9 . For such interventions to be effective, patients need to be involved in active discussion that would enhance their self-efficacy for management of COPD 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, GPs are not adequately reimbursed by Medicare to undertake pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry with current reimbursement being only $34.95 from the Medicare Benefits Schedule which can only be claimed once in any 12-month period. A further barrier is that some GPs and practice nurses (PNs) lack confidence in the interpretation of spirometry [ 11 ] with one study reporting that GPs and PNs misinterpreted spirometry in 30% of cases [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have targeted people over the age of 40 years who are current or ex-smokers with a 10-year or more pack history and have focused on upskilling GPs, PNs or research assistants at performing these screening techniques. These methods have been shown to be effective with the identification of new cases of COPD ranging from 4 to 27%, as well as identifying a high rate of misdiagnosis [ 12 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%