Early intervention evidence for infants with or at risk for cerebral palsy: an overview of systematic reviews

Abstract

Aim To perform an overview of systematic reviews and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on early motor interventions in infants aged 0 to 3 years with or at risk of cerebral palsy to inform current clinical and research efforts and provide a benchmark to assess future interventions ideally initiated within the first 6 months. Method Standardized searches of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted for systematic reviews (2009–2020) and RCTs (2015–2020). Results From 840 unique records, 31 full texts were reviewed, yielding three systematic reviews encompassing 46 studies, 16 with comparison groups, and six additional RCTs that met the criteria. Two enrichment‐ and activity‐based approaches had medium effect sizes on motor development, only one with low risk of bias; two others had large task‐specific effect sizes but some bias concerns; and three enriched environment studies with some bias concerns had medium effect sizes on cognitive development. Most had small or no effect sizes, bias concerns, and uncertain diagnostic determinations. Interpretation Data synthesis revealed limited data quantity and quality, and suggest, although not yet confirmed, greater benefit from early versus later intervention. Research efforts with greater early diagnostic precision and earlier intervention are accelerating, which may transform future outcomes and practices. For over 50% of trials within the reviews, the intervention was compared to standard care with only two showing efficacy. Similar to results in older children, constraint‐induced movement therapy (CIMT) emerged as efficacious with high effect sizes. CIMT was not superior to similarly intense bimanual training or occupational therapy. Goals‐Activity‐Motor Enrichment intervention initiated before 5 months of age was superior to equally intense standard care. Several other enriched environment strategies promoted cognitive and/or motor development.

Pros and cons of botulinum toxin injection therapy in cerebral palsy: A qualitative study exploring caregivers' perspective

“…Caregivers are usually alone in their journey to discover what CP entails, mainly due to the lack of specialized centres in paediatric rehabilitation in Turkey and the lack of structured referral networks that would refer these caregivers to these centres, as stated previously. Today, it is a well‐known fact that early intervention programmes are crucial for patients' treatment success, and these programmes can also help the caregivers in adjusting their perspectives about CP (Damiano & Longo, 2021), but after the initial shock, an adaptation process occurs helping the parents come to terms with the diagnosis. Although this process increases the amount of stress caregivers endure, it is positively affected by the self‐esteem, self‐mastery, positive attitude and support from professional services, which makes informing the caregivers crucial in these early stages (Rentinck et al, 2007).…”

Effect of Motor Intervention for Infants and Toddlers With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…Three systematic reviews have investigated the efficacy of early motor intervention for infants and toddlers with or at high risk of CP younger than 3 years. [8][9][10] One review included infants younger than 12 months, 9 1 included children younger than 2 years, 10 and 1 included children younger than 3 years. 8 The reviews have 3 limitations.…”

‘Better Together’: achieving a global professional network for childhood disability

“…It conducted workshops in member academy meetings in priority areas, and initiated networking support for professionals around the world as children’s services were being impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic. As one example of strategic efforts to partner with other major global organizations, the Best Practice Committee collaborated with the World Health Organization’s Rehabilitation 2030 initiative in the development of a global Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation in cerebral palsy that is now under review by external experts 2,3 . Existing practice guidelines have largely been established within HICs, and member academies are keen to adapt, translate, and disseminate these for implementation in each unique context.…”

“…As one example of strategic efforts to partner with other major global organizations, the Best Practice Committee collaborated with the World Health Organization's Rehabilitation 2030 initiative in the development of a global Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation in cerebral palsy that is now under review by external experts. 2,3 Existing practice guidelines have largely been established within HICs, and member academies are keen to adapt, translate, and disseminate these for implementation in each unique context. The Communication Committee spearheaded the Logo Competition and the Finance Committee is charged with identifying new funding sources to support IAACD activities.…”