2012
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009260.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
269
3
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
269
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we included 17 systematic reviews. 4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Results from systematic reviews A summary of each systematic review is presented narratively below. In addition, Table 2 4,10-25 presents the issues addressed, the main findings from each systematic review and the quality of the evidence (based on the GRADE approach).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we included 17 systematic reviews. 4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Results from systematic reviews A summary of each systematic review is presented narratively below. In addition, Table 2 4,10-25 presents the issues addressed, the main findings from each systematic review and the quality of the evidence (based on the GRADE approach).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the review, 13 the participants needed to have been less than six years of age at treatment onset and to have been assigned to their study condition prior to starting treatment. This review included one RCT and four non-randomized trials (203 participants) that used a treatment-as-usual comparison group.…”
Section: Early Intensive Behavioral Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has emerged both at the programmatic level (Rogers, Estes, Lord, Vismara, Winter, Fitzpatrick, et al, 2012), as well as relative to specifi c areas of intervention like social skills (Reichow & Volkmar, 2010). There are also many other systematic reviews, including multiple meta-analyses that have been recently published highlighting the emergence of evidence-based comprehensive programs for young children with autism (e.g., Reichow, 2012;Reichow, Barton, Boyd, & Hume, 2012;Rogers & Vismara, 2008). The recent advent of new approaches to assessing treatment outcome (including more basic measures of brain processing) is an exciting development (Rogers et al, 2012).…”
Section: Interventions For Autism In Young Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of the effectiveness of early intervention is beyond the scope of this paper, but a number of reviews exist (Howlin, Magiati, Charman, & MacLean, 2009;Reichow, Barton, Boyd, & Hume, 2012;Warren, McPheeters, Sathe, Foss-Feig, Glasser, & VeenstraVanderweele, 2011). Of these reviews there is general agreement that not all children benefi t, and the types and magnitude of benefi ts seen vary from trial to trial.…”
Section: Early Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%