2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early gray dust formation in the type IIn SN 2005ip

Abstract: The physical characteristics of dust formed in supernovae is poorly known. In this paper, we investigate the extinction properties of dust formed in the type IIn SN 2005ip. The observed light curves of SN 2005ip all exhibit a sudden drop around 50 days after discovery. This has been attributed to dust formation in the dense circumstellar medium. We modeled the intrinsic light curves in six optical bands, adopting a theoretical model for the luminosity evolution of supernovae interacting with their circumstella… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only very small masses of dust are required to produce the asymmetries observed at these very early times since the radius of the ejecta is still small. We determine that a dust mass of ∼10 −5 M has condensed in the ejecta by 169 d. Recent analysis by Nielsen et al (2018) identified an acceleration in the decline of the optical light curve commencing at around 50 days. Dust formation in the ejecta would explain this sudden drop.…”
Section: Dust Formation In Sn 2005ip At Early Timesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only very small masses of dust are required to produce the asymmetries observed at these very early times since the radius of the ejecta is still small. We determine that a dust mass of ∼10 −5 M has condensed in the ejecta by 169 d. Recent analysis by Nielsen et al (2018) identified an acceleration in the decline of the optical light curve commencing at around 50 days. Dust formation in the ejecta would explain this sudden drop.…”
Section: Dust Formation In Sn 2005ip At Early Timesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Smith et al (2017) suggested that the SN blast wave was still interacting with a dense, clumpy CSM as late as early 2016, contrary to analysis of the X-ray flux by Katsuda et al (2014) who claim that the forward shock has escaped the CSM shell. Most recently, Nielsen et al (2018) used the light curve evolution of SN 2005ip to determine dust optical depths, concluding that dust formation had occurred in SN 2005ip starting as early as two months after discovery.…”
Section: Observations Of Sn 2005ipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fox et al (2010) obtained a Spitzer Space Telescope Infrared Spectrograph (Houck et al 2004) spectrum of SN 2005ip [the only mid-IR (MIR) spectrum of a SN IIn to date], which revealed the presence of a cooler dust component associated with a pre-existing dust shell radiatively heated by this ongoing CSM interaction. Bevan et al (2018) modelled the spectral line evolution and confirmed that a significant amount of dust can be explained by dust formation in the ejecta, and Nielsen, Hjorth & Gall (2018) found the dust properties to be unlike those of Milky Way dust. Stritzinger et al (2012) continued to monitor SN 2005ip throughout ∼5 yr post-explosion and showed that the optical and NIR light curves underwent little decline over that time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that the radius of the blackbody is just a lower limit of the size of dust shell (Fox et al 2013;Sarangi et al 2018), thus the dust mass calculated with this radius should be regarded as the lower limit and smaller than that derived from the infrared emission. Besides, an inhomogeneous and clumpy structure of dust distribution around SN 2010jl could bring deviation to the estimation of dust mass (Nielsen et al 2018).…”
Section: Dust Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few previous studies show that some Type IIn supernovae have larger value of 𝑅 𝑉 . For example, Nielsen et al (2018) found that 𝑅 𝑉 of the type IIn supernova SN 2005ip increased and became stable in the range of 4.5 to 8.0 after 100 days. However, it is still controversial whether such large value of 𝑅 𝑉 is universal for the type IIn supernovae.…”
Section: The Extinction Law Of Sn 2010jlmentioning
confidence: 99%