“…Improvement scores from the language assessments were calculated using the chronic scores minus the subacute score and dividing by the amount of possible maximal recovery (maximum test score -subacute score) or maximal impairment (subacute score -minimum test score) if the chronic score is lower than subacute. These percentage maximal recovery or impairment (PMRI) values were used in the correlational analyses and this approach is based on similar methods that have been used previously to measure language improvement in aphasia (see Lazar, Speizer, Festa, Krakauer, & Marshall, 2008;Saur et al, 2006;Saur et al, 2010) Separate whole brain analyses were conducted using a factorial ANOVA with the group as the between-subject and conditions as the within-subject factor. Four analyses were carried out, using a 2 (subacute, chronic) x 2 (word, pseudoword), a 2 (subacute, chronic) x 3 (concrete, abstract, pseudoword), a 3 (subacute, chronic, control) x 2 (word, pseudoword) and a 3 (subacute, chronic, control) x 3 (concrete, abstract, pseudoword) factorial.…”