BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early outcome prediction of postanoxic patients in a coma after cardiac arrest proves challenging. Current prognostication relies on multimodal testing, using clinical examination, electrophysiologic testing, biomarkers, and structural MR imaging. While this multimodal prognostication is accurate for predicting poor outcome (ie, death), it is not sensitive enough to identify good outcome (ie, consciousness recovery), thus leaving many patients with indeterminate prognosis. We specifically assessed whether resting-state fMRI provides prognostic information, notably in postanoxic patients in a coma with indeterminate prognosis early after cardiac arrest, specifically for good outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used resting-state fMRI in a prospective study to compare whole-brain functional connectivity between patients with good and poor outcomes, implementing support vector machine learning. Then, we automatically predicted coma outcome using resting-state fMRI and also compared the prediction based on resting-state fMRI with the outcome prediction based on DWI. RESULTS: Of 17 eligible patients who completed the study procedure (among 351 patients screened), 9 regained consciousness and 8 remained comatose. We found higher functional connectivity in patients recovering consciousness, with greater changes occurring within and between the occipitoparietal and temporofrontal regions. Coma outcome prognostication based on resting-state fMRI machine learning was very accurate, notably for identifying patients with good outcome (accuracy, 94.4%; area under the receiver operating curve, 0.94). Outcome predictors using resting-state fMRI performed significantly better (P , .05) than DWI (accuracy, 60.0%; area under the receiver operating curve, 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Indeterminate prognosis might lead to major clinical uncertainty and significant variations in life-sustaining treatments. Resting-state fMRI might bridge the gap left in early prognostication of postanoxic patients in a coma by identifying those with both good and poor outcomes. ABBREVIATIONS: CA ¼ cardiac arrest; EEG ¼ electroencephalography; FC ¼ functional connectivity; ICU ¼ intensive care unit; LOOCV ¼ leave-one-out cross-validation; NPV ¼ negative predictive value; PPV ¼ positive predictive value; rs-fMRI ¼ resting-state fMRI C ardiac arrest (CA) is an important cause of death in the United States and Europe, with an annual incidence of 110/ 100,000. 1,2 Only 7.6% of patients treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survive to hospital discharge. In Europe, 128,000-275,000 individuals per year are treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and 10% survive. 2,3 Due to improvements made in prehospital and intrahospital CA management, a growing number of patients survive the first days following CA, yet can remain unconscious. The main factor determining death in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), accounting for two-thirds of deaths, is postanoxic brain injury, which leads to a w...