Early full weight bearing on cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Fukumoto, Tetsuya; Nomura, Kazutoshi; Hirano, Mako; Hashimoto, Noburo; I, Kenji; Toma, Hiroto

doi:10.5035/nishiseisai.51.208

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There was no indication to suggest the superiority of one method over the other. There is a dearth of evidence in the current literature comparing the two, though Fukumoto et al 28 and Shabana et al 29 agreed that FWB in the immediate post-operative period caused no complications with early radiological and clinical outcomes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over 100,000 total knee replacements (TKRs) are carried out in the UK annually, with cemented fixation accounting for approximately 95% of all primary TKRs. In Australia, 68.1% of all primary TKRs use cemented fixation, and only 10.9% use cementless fixation. However, there has been a renewed interest in cementless fixation as a result of improvements in implant design and manufacturing technology. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of cemented and cementless fixation in primary TKR. Outcome measures included the revision rate and patient-reported functional scores. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from the earliest available date to November 2018 for randomized controlled trials of primary TKAs comparing cemented versus cementless fixation outcomes. Six studies met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 755 knees were included; 356 knees underwent cemented fixation, 399 underwent cementless fixation. They were followed up for an average of 8.4 years (range: 2.0 to 16.6). This study found no significant difference in revision rates and knee function in cemented versus cementless TKR at up to 16.6-year follow-up. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:793-798. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200030

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%