2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02247.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early exposure to nonlethal predation risk by size‐selective predators increases somatic growth and decreases size at adulthood in threespined sticklebacks

Abstract: Predation has an important influence on life history traits in many organisms, especially when they are young. When cues of trout were present, juvenile sticklebacks grew faster. The increase in body size as a result of exposure to cues of predators was adaptive because larger individuals were more likely to survive predation. However, sticklebacks that had been exposed to cues of predators were smaller at adulthood. This result is consistent with some life history theory. However, these results prompt an alte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, predation pressure on sticklebacks (and other species; see Endler, 1995; Relyea, 2004; Vervust et al, 2007) is associated with smaller body size at sexual maturity (Bell, Dingemanse, Hankison, Langenhof, & Rollins, 2011), lower body condition (Frommen et al, 2011), reduced male nuptial coloration (Candolin, 1998) and reduced activity (Lacasse & Aubin-Horth, 2012). In this study, offspring of predator-exposed fathers had traits associated with predator-rich conditions: they were smaller, in poorer body condition, had reduced nuptial coloration (males) and were less active than offspring of unexposed fathers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, predation pressure on sticklebacks (and other species; see Endler, 1995; Relyea, 2004; Vervust et al, 2007) is associated with smaller body size at sexual maturity (Bell, Dingemanse, Hankison, Langenhof, & Rollins, 2011), lower body condition (Frommen et al, 2011), reduced male nuptial coloration (Candolin, 1998) and reduced activity (Lacasse & Aubin-Horth, 2012). In this study, offspring of predator-exposed fathers had traits associated with predator-rich conditions: they were smaller, in poorer body condition, had reduced nuptial coloration (males) and were less active than offspring of unexposed fathers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, over 6 days, sticklebacks were exposed to olfactory, visual and tactile cues of rainbow trout, a natural predator, in order to simulate real predation risk. This procedure elicited enduring changes in stickleback growth and behavior [Dingemanse et al, 2009;Bell et al, 2011], and other studies using this population have shown that they exhibit strong antipredator responses to rainbow trout [Bell and Sih, 2007]. Nanda et al [2008] used a similar procedure to measure the immediate brain transcriptomic response of rats to olfactory, visual and acoustic cues of predators.…”
Section: Applying Predator Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult offspring of predator-exposed fathers were smaller, in poorer condition and less active than offspring of unexposed fathers [28]. Interestingly, sticklebacks that were reared with predation risk [29], or have evolved with predation risk [12], also have these characteristics. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that fathers alter their paternal behavior in response to predation risk, and that fathers can ‘program’ their offspring for living in a high-predation environment.…”
Section: Effects Of Paternal Stress On Offspring Outcomes In Sticklebmentioning
confidence: 99%