2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657408
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early ERP Evidence for Children’s and Adult’s Sensitivity to Scalar Implicatures Triggered by Existential Quantifiers (Some)

Abstract: How quickly do children and adults interpret scalar lexical items in speech processing? The current study examined interpretation of the scalar terms some vs. all in contexts where either the stronger (some = not all) or the weaker interpretation was permissible (some allows all). Children and adults showed increased negative deflections in brain activity following the word some in some-infelicitous versus some-felicitous contexts. This effect was found as early as 100 ms across central electrode sites (in chi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N170 reflects early stages of lexical or sub-lexical orthographic processing during word reading [ 26 ]; [ 27 ]; [ 24 ] and is typically left-lateralized [ 23 ]. The second reading-related component is the centro-parietal N400 [ [28] , [29] ], which reflects semantic processing and peaks around 400 ms after stimulus onset. The N400 is sensitive to lexical properties, particularly semantic relatedness [ 30 , [31] , [32] ], and indicates the integration of semantic information during reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The N170 reflects early stages of lexical or sub-lexical orthographic processing during word reading [ 26 ]; [ 27 ]; [ 24 ] and is typically left-lateralized [ 23 ]. The second reading-related component is the centro-parietal N400 [ [28] , [29] ], which reflects semantic processing and peaks around 400 ms after stimulus onset. The N400 is sensitive to lexical properties, particularly semantic relatedness [ 30 , [31] , [32] ], and indicates the integration of semantic information during reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%