“…Although the study of the postcranial morphology in metatherians has received notable attention, most of it was focused on functional, ontogenetic, and descriptive frames, but not phylogenetics (e.g., Coues, 1869;Flower, 1885;Elftman, 1929;Barnett and Napier, 1953;Mann-Fischer, 1953;Jenkins and Weijs, 1979;Klima, 1987;White, 1990;Pridmore, 1992;Marshall and Sigogneau-Russell, 1995;Lunde and Schutt, 1999;Argot, 2001Argot, , 2002Argot, , 2003aArgot, , 2003bArgot, , 2004aArgot, , 2004bMartin and Mackay, 2003;Muizon and Argot, 2003; but see Szalay, 1994;Szalay and Sargis, 2001;Horovitz and Sá nchezVillagra, 2003). The study of Horovitz and Sá nchez-Villagra (2003) contains numerous postcranial characters treated in high-level taxonomic categories that are interpreted in a cladistic context.…”