2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13229-017-0178-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early development of infants with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case series

Abstract: BackgroundProspective studies of infants at familial risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have yielded insights into the earliest signs of the disorder but represent heterogeneous samples of unclear aetiology. Complementing this approach by studying cohorts of infants with monogenic syndromes associated with high rates of ASD offers the opportunity to elucidate the factors that lead to ASD.MethodsWe present the first report from a prospective study of ten 10-month-old infants with neurofibromatosis type 1 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, delays in high-risk infants who later developed ASD tended to start in the motor domain at 8 months and extend to the social domain by 14 months. This confirms and extends previous findings to high-risk siblings who received a clinical outcome evaluation at 36 months (Estes et al 2015 ; Kolesnik et al 2017 ). However, we found differences between HR-ASD and HR-Typical on Mullen receptive but not expressive language scores, and between LR and HR-ASD or HR-Atypical on Mullen language scores and Vineland communication scores already at 8 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, delays in high-risk infants who later developed ASD tended to start in the motor domain at 8 months and extend to the social domain by 14 months. This confirms and extends previous findings to high-risk siblings who received a clinical outcome evaluation at 36 months (Estes et al 2015 ; Kolesnik et al 2017 ). However, we found differences between HR-ASD and HR-Typical on Mullen receptive but not expressive language scores, and between LR and HR-ASD or HR-Atypical on Mullen language scores and Vineland communication scores already at 8 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…VABS + AOSI vs. VABS alone) suggested that data integration improved predictive performance, though this was only marginally significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. While delays in motor skills have been previously documented in the first year of life (Leonard et al 2014 ; Libertus et al 2014 ), the improved predictive accuracy of integrated communication and motor scores is in contrast with previous findings supporting the emergence of ASD in the sensorimotor domain before 12 months, and moving only later to the social-communication domain (Estes et al 2015 ; Kolesnik et al 2017 ). However, this might be explained by the inclusion of siblings with early emerging language delays, but not ASD, when classification of ASD is extended to classification of broader atypicality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Given some research suggesting that social impairment may be less apparent in younger children with RASopathies, or that individuals may show declining performance relative to peers as they grow older [ 35 , 36 ], we examined the correlation between age and social skills in each of the groups. No association between age and SSIS Social Skills scores was found in the NS group, r = − 0.04, p = 0.787 or the sibling comparison group, r = 0.14, p = 0.452.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaknesses with aspects of language have been found in populations with NF1. Delays in early language development have been noted children as young as 10 months, which appear to persist [20,35,36]. NF1 has been associated with weaknesses with nearly all aspects of language; however, studies have not been consistent [37,38].…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%