1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(98)80224-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early development of chronic active hepatitis in recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation: association with treatment of rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
2
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
108
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that bolus steroids seem to enhance fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent HCV, it would seem prudent to perform liver biopsy in all patients with a marked acute increase in serum liver chemistries rather than offer empiric treatment for rejection. [36][37][38][39] …”
Section: Acute Recurrence Of Hepatitis C Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given that bolus steroids seem to enhance fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent HCV, it would seem prudent to perform liver biopsy in all patients with a marked acute increase in serum liver chemistries rather than offer empiric treatment for rejection. [36][37][38][39] …”
Section: Acute Recurrence Of Hepatitis C Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23][24] During this same time interval, several retrospective studies suggested that the use of monoclonal antibody preparations, multiple steroid boluses for treatment of acute rejection, and the development of steroid-resistant rejection enhanced the histologic severity of recurrent HCV. [14][15][16][37][38][39]41 These observations led to the hypothesis that excessive immunosuppression was deleterious for HCV and a philosophy in which less global immunosuppression was used for patients with chronic HCV infection. As a result, monoclonal antibody preparations were avoided and the rapid tapering and early discontinuation of corticosteroids after transplantation was instituted.…”
Section: Effect Of Immunosuppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a few studies have noted that MELD scores (which include serum creatinine and serum bilirubin) do not accurately predict posttransplantation survival. 35,36 MELD scores did accurately More rejection 6,11,18 Donor age 4 Year of transplantation 5,20 Peak asparate aminotransferase level 21 Cytomegalovirus viremia 22 Human leukocyte antigen compatibility 24,25 Nonwhite race 5 Prolonged rewarming 23 OKT-3 use 19 37 The UCLA model, used in both primary and retransplantation, uses pretransplantation variables readily available to physicians. The model found that predicted posttransplantation survival and Kaplan-Meier survival were similar.…”
Section: Patient Variables and Models For Predicting Patient Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important information is obtained from the liver biopsy which helps determine management strategies. This becomes particularly important in patients who have hepatitis C as their underlying liver disease, because rejection has been shown to have a major deleterious effect on the long-term course of recurrent hepatitis C. 11,12 Chronic rejection, on the other hand, has been decreasing over the past decade, with most transplant centers reporting less than a 4% incidence of this serious complication. 13,14 The reason for the decrease in …”
Section: Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%