2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-016-2911-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early detection of invasive species in marine ecosystems using high-throughput sequencing: technical challenges and possible solutions

Abstract: extremely low abundance, many factors in experimental design and data collection can cause errors including both false negatives and false positives. Here we identify factors responsible for both error types, discuss causes and consequences, and propose possible solutions when utilizing HTS for early detection of NIS in marine and coastal ecosystems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed high congruence of geographical distribution patterns among different clustering scenarios ( p < 0.001), and the distinct variation between areas was consistently detected by each clustering methods (Table ), although both the OTU number and proportions of taxonomy in each clustering threshold were not unchanged, especially for clustering threshold of 99% (Figure S2 and Supporting Information Table S1), which had been emphasized by previous zooplankton studies (Xiong, Li, Zhan, et al., ; Zhan et al., ). Studies have showed that the sensibility of a high level identity threshold (e.g., 99%) might lead to the inflation of OTU numbers because of impacts of sequencing errors (Flynn et al., ; Hirai, Kuriyama, Ichikawa, Hidaka, & Tsuda, ; Razgour et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results showed high congruence of geographical distribution patterns among different clustering scenarios ( p < 0.001), and the distinct variation between areas was consistently detected by each clustering methods (Table ), although both the OTU number and proportions of taxonomy in each clustering threshold were not unchanged, especially for clustering threshold of 99% (Figure S2 and Supporting Information Table S1), which had been emphasized by previous zooplankton studies (Xiong, Li, Zhan, et al., ; Zhan et al., ). Studies have showed that the sensibility of a high level identity threshold (e.g., 99%) might lead to the inflation of OTU numbers because of impacts of sequencing errors (Flynn et al., ; Hirai, Kuriyama, Ichikawa, Hidaka, & Tsuda, ; Razgour et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…PCR programme included an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 25 amplification cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 90 s and a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. PCRs were performed in eight replicates for each sample to reduce biased sampling of rare taxa (Xiong, Li, & Zhan, ; Zhan & MacIsaac, ), and replicates for each sample were combined before purification (SanPrep Column PCR Product Purification Kit, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Subsequently, PCR products from 30 communities were pooled to form one library for sequencing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To pool and sequence all 30 communities, we added unique 8‐nt nucleotide codes (also known as tags) to the 5′‐ends of both the forward and reverse primers for each zooplankton community (Parameswaran et al., ). PCRs were performed in eight replicates for each sample to reduce biased sampling of rare taxa (Xiong, Li, & Zhan, ; Zhan & MacIsaac, ). Each PCR mix (25 μl) consisted of approximately 100 ng of genomic DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 2 m m of Mg 2+ , 0.2 m m of dNTP, 0.4 μ m of each primer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (LA Taq , Takara Inc., Japan).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in this field followed two different approaches, one focusing on the early detection of particular pest species (targeted or active surveillance; e.g., Ardura et al, 2015;Simpson et al, 2016), and the other involving monitoring of communities for signs of appearance of alien species (passive surveillance; e.g., Comtet et al, 2015;Zaiko et al, 2015;Abad et al, 2016;Brown et al, 2016;Xiong et al, 2016). Another side of invasion biology is the assessment of the impact of alien species on native assemblages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%