Early detection of cholera epidemics to support control in fragile states: estimation of delays and potential epidemic sizes

Abstract

Background Cholera epidemics continue to challenge disease control, particularly in fragile and conflict-affected states. Rapid detection and response to small cholera clusters is key for efficient control before an epidemic propagates. To understand the capacity for early response in fragile states, we investigated delays in outbreak detection, investigation, response, and laboratory confirmation, and we estimated epidemic sizes. We assessed predictors of delays, and annual changes in response time. Methods We compiled a list of cholera outbreaks in fragile and conflict-affected states from 2008 to 2019. We searched for peer-reviewed articles and epidemiological reports. We evaluated delays from the dates of symptom onset of the primary case, and the earliest dates of outbreak detection, investigation, response, and confirmation. Information on how the outbreak was alerted was summarized. A branching process model was used to estimate epidemic size at each delay. Regression models were used to investigate the association between predictors and delays to response. Results Seventy-six outbreaks from 34 countries were included. Median delays spanned 1–2 weeks: from symptom onset of the primary case to presentation at the health facility (5 days, IQR 5–5), detection (5 days, IQR 5–6), investigation (7 days, IQR 5.8–13.3), response (10 days, IQR 7–18), and confirmation (11 days, IQR 7–16). In the model simulation, the median delay to response (10 days) with 3 seed cases led to a median epidemic size of 12 cases (upper range, 47) and 8% of outbreaks ≥ 20 cases (increasing to 32% with a 30-day delay to response). Increased outbreak size at detection (10 seed cases) and a 10-day median delay to response resulted in an epidemic size of 34 cases (upper range 67 cases) and < 1% of outbreaks < 20 cases. We estimated an annual global decrease in delay to response of 5.2% (95% CI 0.5–9.6, p = 0.03). Outbreaks signaled by immediate alerts were associated with a reduction in delay to response of 39.3% (95% CI 5.7–61.0, p = 0.03). Conclusions From 2008 to 2019, median delays from symptom onset of the primary case to case presentation and to response were 5 days and 10 days, respectively. Our model simulations suggest that depending on the outbreak size (3 versus 10 seed cases), in 8 to 99% of scenarios, a 10-day delay to response would result in large clusters that would be difficult to contain. Improving the delay to response involves rethinking the integration at local levels of event-based detection, rapid diagnostic testing for cluster validation, and integrated alert, investigation, and response.

Effectiveness of hygiene kit distribution to reduce cholera transmission in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018: a prospective cohort study

“…The overall potential for impact of the intervention, therefore, may be considerably less than this study’s finds. Further, the 16-week delay between outbreak confirmation and intervention delivery would need to be greatly shortened, 33 43 coverage of interventions would need to be greater 89 90 and surveillance would need to be more timely and heightened 33 91 92 if this intervention were to have an impact on early epidemic propagation.…”

Exploring relationships between drought and epidemic cholera in Africa using generalised linear models

“…Cholera outbreak occurrence appears conditionally independent of year given the other covariates in the model, as time does not cause cholera but instead the changes in covariates over time, making them good predictors of cholera outbreak occurrence. It is also thought that some temporal increases in cholera are due to global improvements for detection of all-pathogen outbreaks from the mid 1990s onwards, especially in low- and middle-income countries, improving countries’ capacity for detection, response and therefore reporting [ 44 , 45 ].…”

Observance Des Mesures Barrières De Lutte Contre La Maladie A Coronavirus-19 & Morbi-Mortalités Liées Au Cholera En Zone EndemoEpidémique De La République Démocratique Du Congo

“…Dans une étudepréliminaire sur le choléraàMoba [18], les auteurs avaient démontré que la communication pour le changement de comportement et l'amélioration des conditions d'hygiène demeuraient, comme souligné par certains chercheurs [31] - [33], les piliers de la diminution drastique de la morbidité et de la mortalité liées au cholera. C'est ce qui a été constaté durant la période de la pandémie à covi-19 dans notre milieu.…”